Newdow Tries To End Presidential Inauguration Prayer

SAN FRANCISCO — The atheist who persuaded a federal appeals court to strike down the Pledge of Allegiance because of the words “under God” has lost a separate bid to abolish prayer at presidential inaugurations.  

Michael Newdow argued that the Rev. Franklin Graham’s prayer at President George W. Bush’s 2001 inauguration was an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

But a three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Newdow did not suffer “a sufficiently concrete and specific injury” to pursue his claim. In 2002, a three-judge panel of the same San Francisco court agreed with Newdow that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional when recited in public schools. The Supreme Court will hear the case next month. Newdow challenged the pledge on behalf of his daughter, claiming she was wrongly being exposed to religion in public school.

Ad: Vacation? City Trip? Weekend Break? Book Skip-the-line tickets

Travel Religiously

Book skip-the-line tickets to the worlds major religious sites — or to any other place in the world.

We appreciate your support

One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission — at no additional cost to you — for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this service free of charge.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog)
Associated Press, USA
Feb. 24, 2004

More About This Subject

Religion News Blog last updated this post on CET (Central European Time)