What The World Thinks Of God: Can religion be blamed for war?

Are religion and religious differences to blame for war and conflict? Many war leaders have claimed to have God on their side, but should religion get the blame? A “War Audit” investigating the links between war and religion through the ages has been carried out by researchers at the Department of Peace Studies at Bradford University.

George Bush was in little doubt about how the US-led coalition would bring down Saddam Hussein.

“With the might of God on our side we will triumph over Iraq,” the President declared.

“God will watch over our troops and grant us a victory over the threat of Saddam’s army. God will bless us and keep us safe in the coming battle.”

But God’s help was being invoked in Baghdad, too. Saddam Hussein told Iraqis: “Fight as God ordered you to do.”

So does that makes last year’s Iraq conflict a religious war?

What The World Thinks Of God

BBC Two: Thursday, 26 February, 2004 at 21:00 GMT

BBC World Service: Sunday, 29 February, 2004 at 13:06 GMT

Discuss the issues raised in a special edition of Talking Point, on BBC World Service radio and the website, Sunday, 29 February, 2004 at 14:06 GMT

The authors of the War Audit suggest that it was arguably a war driven by religion.

But, as they point out, the Pope and the US Catholic bishops, the Archbishop of Canterbury and many theologians around the world argued that it fell well short of the rigorous criteria for a “just” war.

President Bush and Saddam Hussein were only the most recent of a long line of political leaders who have drawn on religion to help them in battle or to justify a military campaign.

But the War Audit set out to identify conflicts that were more closely linked to religious belief than to political causes – that could most properly be called religious wars.

And that, it concluded, means going back to the wars of Islamic expansion beginning in the 7th Century, the Crusades starting in the 11th Century and the Reformation wars beginning in the 16th Century.

Here the wars were fought primarily because of religious differences.

Most are much more complex.

To some extent, the nature of a war is in the eye of the beholder.

Political grievances

Osama Bin Laden portrays the campaign being waged by his terror network as a religious duty.

But the authors of the War Audit say it is much more about his opposition to the political order in Arab countries and the presence of US forces in Muslim nations.

One of the most extraordinary armed campaigns I have witnessed was that of the Holy Spirit Movement in Uganda in the 1980s, the forerunner of the Lord’s Resistance Army that remains locked in battle with the Ugandan army in northern Uganda today.

Alice Lakwena, the leader of the Holy Spirit Movement, claimed that God had commanded her to seize the Ugandan capital and I and other journalists found and interviewed her in a banana grove about 100 kilometres (60 miles) short of Kampala.

Superstition played a large part in the progress her ragtag band of followers had made.

They smeared themselves with a potion they were told would protect them against the army’s bullets.

But this bizarre campaign has also fed on northern political grievances in Uganda.

And this is echoed down the ages.

Few truly religious wars

The War Audit says that although armed conflicts may take on religious overtones, their genesis invariably lies in factors such as ethnicity, identity, power struggles, resources, inequality and oppression – and one factor is often exacerbated by another.

It is often suggested that there has been a sharp rise in religiously motivated conflict.

But the authors of the War Audit say there have been very few genuinely religious wars in the past century.

The Israel-Arab wars from 1948 to the present day are often seen as wars over religion.

In fact, they say, they have been about nationalism, self-defence or the liberation of territory.

So why is religion a factor in war at all when all the main faiths have little time for violence and advocate peace?

Because, it is suggested, leaders use differences over faith as a way of sowing hatred and mobilising support for political wars.

As the American civil war leader Abraham Lincoln put it almost 150 years ago: “The will of God prevails.

“In great contests, each party claims to act in accordance with the will of God. Both may be, but one must be wrong.

“God cannot be for and against the same thing at the same time.”

Vacation? Short break? Day trip? Get Skip-the-line tickets at GetYourGuide.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)
Feb. 24, 2004
Mike Wooldridge, BBC World Affairs Correspondent

Religion News Blog posted this on Tuesday February 24, 2004.
Last updated if a date shows here:


More About This Subject


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at Amazon.com.