Guantanamo a ‘kangaroo court’ – British judge

A senior British law lord has delivered a scathing attack on the US Government’s and the American courts’ treatment of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, branding it “a monstrous failure of justice”.

Lord Steyn, one of the most senior judges in Britain’s highest court, described the military tribunal for trying the detainees as a “kangaroo court”. The term, he said, implied “a pre-ordained arbitrary rush to judgement by an irregular tribunal, which makes a mockery of justice”. He asked whether the British Government should not “make plain, publicly and unambiguously, our condemnation of the utter lawlessness” at Guantanamo Bay.

Delivering the F.A. Mann lecture in London on Tuesday, Lord Steyn said: “Trials of the type contemplated by the United States Government would be a stain on United States justice. The only thing that could be worse is simply to leave the prisoners in their black hole indefinitely.”

Lord Steyn said it was a recurring theme in history “that in times of war, armed conflict or perceived national danger, even liberal democracies adopt measures infringing human rights in ways that are wholly disproportionate to the crisis. Often the loss of liberty is permanent”.

Judges were often too deferential to the executive even in peacetime. He regarded it as “a monstrous failure of justice” that, so far, the US courts had decided they could not even consider credible medical evidence that a detainee had been or was being tortured.

The Red Cross had described the camp at Guantanamo Bay as principally a centre of interrogation rather than detention. Officials had been reported as saying that the techniques of interrogation were “not quite torture, but as close as you can get”.

“The purpose of holding the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay was, and is, to put them beyond the rule of law, beyond the protection of any courts, and at the mercy of the victors,” Lord Steyn said. “The procedural rules do not prohibit the use of force to coerce prisoners to confess,” he said. “On the contrary, the rules expressly provide that statements made by a prisoner under physical and mental duress are admissible ‘if the evidence would have value to a reasonable person’, that is, military officers trying enemy soldiers.”

Lord Steyn said the military would act as interrogators, prosecutors, defence counsel, judges and executioners. Trials would be held in secret, with no basic guarantees for a fair trial. The jurisdiction of the US courts was excluded. The military controlled everything, subject to decisions of President George Bush, even on guilt or innocence in individual cases, as well as sentences. Mr Bush had already described the prisoners as “killers”.

The concession extracted by the British Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, that the British detainees would not face the death penalty, gave a new dimension to the concept of “most favoured nation” treatment, he said. “How could it be morally defensible to discriminate in this way between individual prisoners?”

• Three children captured in Afghanistan and held for months at Guantanamo Bay as enemy combatants will be released and sent home, said Major-General Geoffrey Miller, Joint Task Force-Guantanamo chief.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)
The Guardian (UK, via The Age (Australia), UK
Nov. 27, 2003
Clare Dyer

Religion News Blog posted this on Thursday December 4, 2003.
Last updated if a date shows here:


More About This Subject


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at