Several complain about noise and traffic from the residential drug treatment facility on Balboa Peninsula and about a second unit.
Neighbors of an oceanfront drug treatment center in Newport Beach are complaining to City Hall that facility operators are violating the occupancy limit in one house while expanding by renting another home nearby.
Several residents near the three-story home operated on the Balboa Peninsula by Narconon, a private network of more than 100 drug rehabilitation and prevention centers around the world, complain about noise, clouds of cigarette smoke drifting into their homes and traffic in the narrow alley that separates them from their neighbors.
But what drove them to petition City Hall for relief, they say, was Narconon’s recent rental of a smaller home across an alley that they said worsened the situation.
City Atty. Robert Burnham said Newport Beach does not regulate drug and alcohol treatment facilities, which are governed by state law. But after neighbors complained at recent council meetings, Burnham instructed city staff to prepare a resolution for council consideration that would require a city permit for facilities that treat seven or more people.
Narconon’s second dwelling houses a maximum of five residents and is in compliance with city ordinances, Burnham said. Company officials say the residents of that home are not in rehabilitation.
Narconon executives say they have been good neighbors since moving into the first home in 1995 and are eager to resolve any problems.
“There is nothing that I will not work out with my neighbors,” said Larry Trahant, executive director of the program’s Southern California division. “There is no one that I will not listen to ï¿½ to resolve a legitimate problem.”
Neighbor Ted Brandt said the drug treatment facility is “a great community service. Those people have enough trouble without more hassles.” He said Narconon clients are often better neighbors than “a lot of people around here who are big partyers.”
But Linda Orozco, who lives across the alley behind the main facility, on Ocean Front, said complaints about noise and rude behavior have been ignored.
She and other residents also say that facility is overcrowded and that Narconon has added to their problems by putting more clients in the second home.
Orozco, neighbor Michael Bacus and others contend that the number of clients staying at the main facility exceeds the number allowed by the city. Burnham said the city allows 27 residents in the house, even though the state allows 32. He said the Fire Department is trying to have the state permit amended to reflect the city’s limit of 27.
Neighbors say Narconon’s incentive to overcrowd is the $20,000 fee clients are charged.
Glenn Farnsworth, director of the center, said that even though the state allows treatment of 32 residents, the number recently was reduced to 27 because of the anticipated change in the state permit.
Trahant, however, insisted that the facility is treating 32 clients, as the permit still allows.
“We are following all state laws,” he said. “We are in violation of nothing.”
He added that the neighbors’ complaints stem from the NIMBY syndrome: “not in my back yard.”
“Nobody wants this near them; that’s a fact,” he said.
He said Narconon’s reported 75% success rate speaks for itself, but he submitted testimonials from recovering addicts, parents and others who hailed the program.
The treatment phase itself typically lasts two five months, and after clients complete the program, they can return to the facility free of charge when they have a serious need.
We appreciate your support
One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at Amazon.com.
Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission — at no additional cost to you — for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this service free of charge.