Jehovah’s Witness refuses blood for her unborn twins

A pregnant woman with severely anaemic twins has objected to the babies receiving a potentially life-saving blood transfusion when they are born on religious grounds, the High Court was told yesterday.

The HSE now plans to ask the court tomorrow for an order permitting it to give a blood transfusion to the babies after the birth if the woman carries out her threat.

Would You Trust The WatchTower Society?
While the Watchtower Society (the organization behind Jehovah’s Witnesses) claims to represent God, its leaders can not make up their minds about what He says.
They have come up with their own version of the Bible (necessary to support the organization’s unbiblical teachings), constantly go back and forth on a wide variety of issues, and keep getting their prophecies about the end of the world wrong. See these quotes — from their own publications — for documentation.
Here is the Watchtower’s history on the issue of blood. Many Jehovah’s Witnesses (or their kids) have died as a result of that nonsense. Would you trust your life — and that of your loved ones — to these quacks?
Theologically, Jehovah’s Witnesses is a cult of Christianity.
Sociologically, the movement has cult-like elements as well.

Comments & resources by ReligionNewsBlog.com

In a brief application yesterday, Brian Murray, counsel for the HSE, told Ms Justice Mary Laffoy that the mother, a patient of Cork University Hospital, was 32-weeks pregnant and her expected babies are severely anaemic.

When advised about the need for a blood transfusion, the mother and her partner had made it clear they objected to the procedure.

Ms Justice Laffoy asked whether the objection was on religious grounds and Mr Murray replied that it was.

It is believed the parents, who cannot be named by court order, are non-nationals and are members of the Jehovah’s Witness Congregation.

It is understood the expectant mother has not objected to their delivery being induced later this week and the HSE believes the babies are at risk and should be delivered before the weekend.

In those circumstances, Ms Justice Laffoy granted leave to Mr Murray to serve notice on the parents of the children of the HSE’s intention to apply tomorrow for an order permitting the transfusion when the babies are born.

Mr Murray also secured an interim order restraining publication of the names of the parents. This is the second such case to come before the courts here in a matter of months. Last December doctors caring for a premature baby were authorised to give the child a blood transfusion if necessary.

Brinkmanship

This was in spite of objections by the parents who are Jehovah’s Witnesses. Mr Justice George Bermingham said it would amount to brinkmanship and an abdication of responsibility if he did not extend an order giving the National Maternity Hospital in Holles Street, Dublin the right to intervene with a blood transfusion if necessary.

Earlier last year a Congolese woman who was a Jehovah’s Witness and received a blood transfusion contrary to her religious beliefs said she believed an alternative remedy of coca-cola and tomatoes should have been given to her when she refused the transfusion.

Regardless of the medical considerations, Jehovah’s Witnesses advocate that doctors should uphold the right of a patient to choose what treatments they accept or reject.

This religious position is due to a belief that blood is sacred and represents life in God’s eyes. The parents of the the unborn twins were not present at yesterday’s hearing.

Source

(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)
Tim Healy and Eilish O'Regan, Irish Independent, Apr. 23, 2008, http://www.independent.ie

Religion News Blog posted this on Wednesday April 23, 2008.
Last updated if a date shows here:

   

More About This Subject

AFFILIATE LINKS

Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at Amazon.com.