VANCOUVER – A doctor who looked after a set of severely premature sextuplets in British Columbia last year says blood transfusions seemed to be the least dangerous solution to their medical ills.
The parents, who can’t be named to protect their children, now want the B.C. Supreme Court to rule the seizure of the babies was unconstitutional.
Neonatologist Dr. Alfonso Solimano testified Tuesday in B.C. Supreme Court that the children’s oxygen supply was compromised and the blood-transfusion decision seemed the least dangerous option.
He said there were other ways to deal with the dropping oxygen levels in the babies’ bodies, but the side effects were much more severe than a blood transfusion.
“It seemed the least potentially dangerous problem,” he said. “These babies were not healthy.”
– Four Dangers of the Jehovah’s Witness Organization
Solimano said the oxygen levels in the babies blood was going down and their heart rates were dropping.
“Every way which the oxygen gets delivered to the tissues was being compromised,” Solimano testified.
Four of the sextuplets survived and just recently celebrated their first birthday.
Dr. Robin Ohls, a neonatologist testifying on behalf of the parents, told the hearing Monday that test results on the children showed blood transfusions weren’t necessary.
Lawyers for the B.C. government argued in earlier hearings that saving the lives of the two boys and two girls superseded the parents’ rights.
We appreciate your support
Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission — at no additional cost to you — for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this service free of charge.