Prosecutor rejects charges in Bountiful sex abuse case

First an ad for the coffee maker the editors of Religion News Blog use both at home and at work. Read the reviews, and find out why coffee connoisseurs LOVE brewing coffee with the ...

Vancouver — An independent special prosecutor has rejected the idea of criminal charges over allegations of sexual abuse involving members of a polygamist sect in the southeastern B.C. community of Bountiful, and instead recommended the constitutionality of the Criminal Code section on polygamy should be tested in the courts.

Richard Peck, asked in May to consider the issue B.C.’s criminal justice branch, handed down his recommendations today.

See Also

To see where Bountiful fits in with regard to polygamous sects of the Mormon Church, check the Polygamy Leadership Tree

He was tasked to look at issues around Bountiful, home of members of a fundamentalist Mormon sect that practices polygamy though it is illegal in Canada. B.C. Attorney-General Wally Oppal has described action against polygamy in the community as a foremost priority.

Mr. Peck called a reference to the B.C. Court of Appeal — “with a probable further appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada” — the “preferable approach” to an outright prosecution over conduct in the community in southeastern B.C.

“The legality of polygamy in Canada has, for too long, been characterized by uncertainty,” he wrote in a report, sections of which were released to the media. “The integrity of the legal system suffers from such an impasse and an authoritative statement from the courts is necessary in order to resolve it.”

Mr. Peck, a Vancouver lawyer, noted that polygamy has long been illegal in Canada, and is currently illegal under section 293 of the Criminal Code.

“However, prosecutions under this law have been exceedingly rare.”

In 1990 and 2006, police recommended charges against individuals in Bountiful, but the Crown ruled out the idea because, in 1990, of fears that the polygamy ban would be struck down by the courts as an unjustifiable infringement of religious freedoms protected by the Charter and, in 2006, because the available evidence left four senior Crowns assigned to review the file with the view that there was not a substantial likelihood of conviction.

“After an extensive study of the relevant material, I have come to the conclusion that polygamy itself is at the root of the problem,” writes Mr. Peck. “Polygamy is the underlying phenomenon from which all the other alleged harms flow, and the public interest would best be served by addressing it directly.”

Mr. Peck has agreed to go to court to act in any proceedings that result from his recommendations.

Mr. Oppal was scheduled to respond this afternoon to Mr. Peck’s conclusions.

We appreciate your support

One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission — at no additional cost to you — for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this service free of charge.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog)
The Globe and Mail, Canada
Aug. 1, 2007
Ian Bailey

More About This Subject

This post was last updated: Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 12:19 AM, Central European Time (CET)