The Mormon massacre

Opening in theaters Friday, a motion picture called “September Dawn” depicts a brutal American massacre that has been forgotten.

On Sept. 11, 1857, in Utah Territory, Mormons slaughtered more than 120 California-bound settlers from Arkansas. Retelling the 9/11 carnage of 150 years ago does not help Mormon Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign.

The basic facts about the Mountain Meadows Massacre are not in dispute. Mormons mobilized Paiute Indians, accompanied by Mormons disguised as Indians, to attack a peaceful wagon train. The settlers beat off the attack but were left short of food and ammunition.

They disarmed themselves at the request of Mormons who said they would lead them to safety but instead turned on the settlers, murdering every man, woman and child above the age of 8. All that is in doubt historically is whether this was ordered by Brigham Young, president of the Mormon Church and territorial governor of Utah. “September Dawn” says he was responsible; the church denies it.

Today’s Mormons cannot be blamed for these events. Nevertheless, Romney has followed the church’s example in ignoring this movie. He will not comment on “September Dawn” and indeed will not watch it. That follows his decision not to defend his Mormon faith or actively fight religious bias that has impeded his candidacy.

I attended an April 11 screening of the movie at the Motion Picture Association of America headquarters in Washington, hosted by its lead actor: Academy Award-winner Jon Voight. A conservative, he said this was no hit against Romney. “I didn’t even know he was running when we began this,” Voight told viewers after the screening. But he said this terrible story is important considering America’s war against terrorists.

The Mormon Church

Given that the theology and practice of the Mormon Church violates essential Christian doctrines, Mormonism does not represent historical, Biblical Christianity, is not a Christian denomination, and is not in any way part of the Christian church.

The church always has accepted Young’s plea that he had nothing to do with the massacre. But Voight is certain that he did, based on research for the movie. “If any miserable scoundrels come here, cut their throats,” Young said in his “Blood Atonement Sermon.” The movie’s researchers found in church archives a generic threat against interlopers: “I will loose the Indians on them, and I will slit their throats from ear to ear.”

In response to this column’s inquiry, a Mormon Church spokeswoman Wednesday said: “The weight of historical evidence shows that Brigham Young did not authorize the massacre.”

John D. Lee, Young’s adopted son who led the massacre, was executed by a firing squad 20 years after the killings — the only person punished. In his autobiography, he said the attack was planned “by the direct command of Brigham Young.”

My first experience with the Mormon Church was watching the 1940 film “Brigham Young.” It depicted the original Mormon settlers in Utah as persecuted and peaceful, and Young as prudent and wise. When some Mormons complained then that Young came over as vacillating, church president Heber J. Grant said of the movie: “I endorse it with all my heart. This is one of the greatest days of my life.” He knew it could have been much worse.

Mitt Romney surely is not responsible for what kind of man Brigham Young was, but that question hurts his candidacy. Romney has been described by many Republican insiders as the perfect candidate: magnetic, smart and with an excellent record as an executive. His greatest liability has been religious bias against him. He has never seized this issue, thinking it so wrongheaded that it will go away.

Similarly, he has rejected efforts by the producers of “September Dawn” to reach out to him. I made three attempts without success to get his views of the movie. Neither watching it nor condemning it, he may just hope that Americans will not include this bloody tragedy in their spring and summer viewing.

Robert Novak is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Source

(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)
Robert Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, via the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, May 2, 2007, http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib

Religion News Blog posted this on Friday May 4, 2007.
Last updated if a date shows here:

   

More About This Subject

AFFILIATE LINKS

Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at Amazon.com.