French Court Rules for Newspaper That Printed Muhammad Cartoons

PARIS, March 22 — A French court ruled Thursday in favor of a satirical weekly newspaper that faced charges brought by two Muslim groups after it published cartoons featuring the Prophet Muhammad that had caused an international uproar when a Danish newspaper published most of them.

The charges, brought by the Paris Mosque and the Union of Islamic Organizations of France, accused the newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, and its editor, Philippe Val, of “publicly abusing a group of people because of their religion.”

Charlie Hebdo

Ad: Vacation? City Trip? Weekend Break? Book Skip-the-line tickets

The charges could have resulted in a six-month prison term for Mr. Val and a fine of about $29,000 against the newspaper.

In its Feb. 8, 2006, issue, Charlie Hebdo republished 12 drawings that appeared in September 2005 in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, some of them lampooning the Prophet Muhammad. The publication in Denmark set off deadly rioting across parts of the Muslim world and resulted in Muslim boycotts of Danish products.

Charlie Hebdo published the cartoons in solidarity with the Danish newspaper and to make a point about freedom of expression in France, which has the largest Muslim population in Europe.

What Muslims Should Protest

In the civilized world people value freedom of speech. Also, in the civilized world, kidnappings, beheadings, bombings, death threats, destruction of property, and other acts of terrorism are unacceptable responses to insults (real or perceived). Stop protesting free speech. Stop protesting cartoons. Stop being hypocritical. Protest despicable behavior instead:

On the cover of its Feb. 8, 2006, issue, Charlie Hebdo published an original drawing by the French cartoonist Cabu depicting a crying Muhammad with his head in his hands, saying, “It’s hard to be loved by idiots.”

The publication in France set off a public debate on the country’s devotion to its secular ideals. While France has limits on public expression, particularly with regard to racist speech, enforcement varies according to the national mood and penalties for infractions are usually low.

The court acknowledged that one of the cartoons, which depicted Muhammad wearing a turban shaped like a bomb, might offend some Muslims. But it said that, given the context of its publication, it saw no “deliberate intention of directly and gratuitously offending the Muslim community.”

Last September, a Danish court rejected a similar lawsuit against Jyllands-Posten.

Mr. Val called the ruling a victory for freedom of speech and secular French Muslims.

The Union of Islamic Organizations of France said it would appeal the decision. The Paris Mosque said through its lawyer that it probably would not.

Source

(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)
Craig S. Smith, New York Times, Mar. 22, 2007, http://www.nytimes.com

Religion News Blog posted this on Friday March 23, 2007.
Last updated if a date shows here:

   

More About This Subject

AFFILIATE LINKS

Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at Amazon.com.

Travel Religiously

Book skip-the-line tickets to the worlds major religious sites — or to any other place in the world.