Supreme Court won’t hear Da Vinci Code case

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to the author of the “The Da Vinci Code,” refusing to consider a case alleging copyright infringement.

Author Lewis Perdue contends that Dan Brown’s megathriller is substantially similar to his book, written years before the 2003 publication of “The Da Vinci Code.

Some 60.5 million copies of “The Da Vinci Code” are in print worldwide.

Perdue argues that affidavits detailing similarities between his book, “Daughter of God,” and Brown’s book should have been considered by a federal judge, who rejected them. The judge ruled that no reasonable juror could find parts of Perdue’s work substantially similar to “The Da Vinci Code.” An appeals court upheld the ruling.

In one of the rejected affidavits, a literary expert found the evidence of infringement overwhelming. In another affidavit, a foreign linguistics expert found the similarities to be “striking.”

Perdue had alleged that Brown copied the basic premise of “Daughter of God,” including notions that history is controlled by victors, not losers, and the importance of the Roman Emperor Constantine in requiring a transition from a female to a male-dominated religion, the judge said.

Brown and Random House Inc. had filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Manhattan seeking a declaratory judgment that his work does not infringe on Perdue’s.

In a countersuit, Perdue asked the judge to rule that there was infringement and award $150 million in damages.

The case is Perdue v. Brown and Random House Inc., 06-213.

Vacation? Short break? Day trip? Get Skip-the-line tickets at GetYourGuide.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)

Religion News Blog posted this on Tuesday November 14, 2006.
Last updated if a date shows here:


More About This Subject


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at