In Irish legal first, judge orders life-saving transfusion for woman opposed to procedure

DUBLIN, Ireland — In a legal first for Ireland, a hospital performed a life-saving blood transfusion Thursday night on a woman who had rejected the procedure on religious grounds.

High Court Justice Henry Abbott ruled that doctors at Dublin’s Coombe Hospital should be permitted to perform a transfusion on the woman, a 23-year-old immigrant from the Congo who had just given birth to a healthy boy. The woman was identified as a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, a Christian sect which believes that the Bible forbids transfusions.

Lawyers for the hospital conceded that the woman — who suffered a hemorrhage and lost most of her blood supply Thursday morning before being stabilized — was cognizant and, if carried by stretcher into the courtroom, would have testified that her faith prevented her from receiving a transfusion.

Jehovah’s Witnesses and Blood

“[T]he Jehovah’s Witnesses organization prohibits the use of blood transfusions. Individual Jehovah’s Witnesses are expected to die or let their children die, rather than break this command, even though the Scriptures nowhere teach that blood transfusions are wrong.”
Four Dangers of the Jehovah’s Witness Organization

But Abbott said Ireland’s constitution required that precedence be given to the welfare of the woman’s newborn child. He said to refuse the transfusion would deny the child a mother, who was identified in court only as “Ms. K.” The judge noted that the woman had no other known relatives or close friends who could raise the baby if she died.

The Coombe, one of Ireland’s major maternity hospitals, said its policy was to do all it could to save a patient’s life — and to go to court if necessary to do it.

“In the event of a patient refusing medical treatment and where the case is deemed to be life-threatening, it is the policy of the hospital to seek legal advice and in some cases this may lead to court proceedings,” the Coombe said in a statement.

Abbott’s ruling was the first time in Ireland that a judge overruled an adult’s clearly stated wishes to refuse medical treatment on religious grounds. But other judges previously have overruled Jehovah’s Witnesses on the question of performing transfusions on their children.

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Theologically, Jehovah’s Witnesses are a cult of Christianity. The oppressive organization does not represent historical, Biblical Christianity in any way.

Sociologically, it is a destructive cult whose false teachings frequently result in spiritual and psychological abuse, as well as needless deaths.

In order to be able to support its unbiblical doctrines, the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization has created it’s own version of the Bible. The so-called “New World Translation” is rejected by all Christian denominations.

In 2004, a judge overruled a Jehovah’s Witness who did not want her 5-month-old daughter to undergo open-heart surgery. The court on that occasion declared the infant a ward of court, effectively becoming its legal guardian, and the baby’s life was saved through the operation.

And in 2000, when a Jehovah’s Witness couple refused to permit a transfusion for their 2-year-old boy, police intervened and had him declared a ward of the local health authority. The boy, who had suffered serious crush injuries when a wall fell on him, was saved.

Vacation? Short break? Day trip? Get Skip-the-line tickets at GetYourGuide.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)

Religion News Blog posted this on Friday September 22, 2006.
Last updated if a date shows here:


More About This Subject


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at