Librarian: ‘Da Vinci’ Suit Lacks Merit

First an ad for the coffee maker the editors of Religion News Blog use both at home and at work. Read the reviews, and find out why coffee connoisseurs LOVE brewing coffee with the ...

CHILLICOTHE, Ohio — A retired librarian who helped novelist Dan Brown conduct research for the mega-selling thriller “The Da Vinci Code” said a lawsuit accusing Brown of stealing ideas from other writers is bogus.

Stan Planton, 58, a retired head librarian at Ohio University-Chillicothe, said Tuesday he’s puzzled by the court case, which began this week in London.

He downplayed his role with the book, saying he exchanged e-mails with Brown prior to publication of “The Da Vinci Code,” helping Brown locate information on the lineage of French kings and other minor details.

“I was just being a librarian, helping someone find what they needed,” said Planton, who retired last year. He said he has not been contacted by attorneys involved in the lawsuit.

Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, authors of the 1982 nonfiction book “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,” are suing Random House, claiming that parts of their work formed the basis of Brown’s 2003 novel, which has sold more than 40 million copies and has been made into a film starring Tom Hanks.

They say that Brown “appropriated the architecture” of their book, which explores theories that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, that the couple had a child and that the bloodline survives.

Random House, which also published “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,” denies the claim.

An attorney for Baigent and Leigh told the court that Brown’s wife, Blythe Brown, and Planton scoured religious and historical texts on Brown’s behalf as he wrote his novel, typing up notes and in some instances, copying parts of the 1982 book.

Planton said he doesn’t know anything about that.

“His wife was doing much of the research,” said Planton, who said he didn’t save any of his e-mails. “They work in a very symbiotic relationship.”

The Da Vinci Code

So error-laden is The Da Vinci Code that the educated reader actually applauds those rare occasions where Brown stumbles (despite himself) into the truth. […] In the end, Dan Brown has penned a poorly written, atrociously researched mess.;br />Source: Dismantling The Da Vinci Code By Sandra Miesel, Crisis, Sep. 1, 2003;br />

;br />

Planton said he can’t recall if “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” ever came up.

“I was aware that the book existed, but I never read it,” Planton said.

If the writers succeed in securing an injunction to bar the use of their material, they could hold up the scheduled May 19 release of “The Da Vinci Code” movie, directed by Ron Howard. Sony Pictures said it planned to release the film on time.

“The irony of the whole lawsuit is that Dan Brown has made those authors rich because publicity around ‘The Da Vinci Code’ turned their book into a best seller after being on the back shelf of libraries and bookstores for years,” Planton said.

Planton said he met Brown in 1998 through a mutual friend who was trying to help Brown answer questions about code-breaking and technical military scientific trivia.

The inscription in Planton’s copy of “The Da Vinci Code” reads: “Stan — Without you, this book would have been a lot shorter. Thanks for all the info. Dan”

We appreciate your support

One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission — at no additional cost to you — for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this service free of charge.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog)
AP, via, USA;br />Mar. 1, 2006 ;br />

More About This Subject

This post was last updated: Monday, November 30, -0001 at 12:00 AM, Central European Time (CET)