Court: Church elders not liable

In a decision that examined secular obligations for those with religious commitments, the state Supreme Court ruled that a church cannot be sued for failing to protect children from parental abuse.

Two sisters had sought damages from the Jehovah’s Witnesses congregation in Wilton and the national Watchtower Bible & Tract Society, charging local church elders did not notify civil authorities about the abuse Paul Berry had inflicted on them as youths.

But the state’s highest court on Friday sided with a lower court in dismissing their suit. The Supreme Court ruled that although the elders had a moral obligation to intervene, they had no common law duty.

“Unfortunately the church has been told it is not responsible,” attorney Marci Hamilton, who represented the sisters, said in a telephone interview from Pennsylvania.

Paul Berry received one of the toughest sentences ever in the state for sexually abusing his stepdaughter Holly Brewer: 56 to 112 years in prison. Charges that he had abused his biological daughter, Heather Berry, were dropped after his conviction in the first case.

The sisters’ mother, Sara Poisson, revealed during the trial that she had confided numerous times to church elders that Paul Berry was physically and emotionally abusing the girls; she did not suspect sexual abuse. Poisson testified church elders told her to remain quiet, pray more and try to be a better spouse.

Last year, Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge William Groff dismissed the sisters’ lawsuit. The Supreme Court backed Groff’s decision, despite citing different legal precedent in its finding.

In essence, the Supreme Court echoed Groff’s ruling that even if someone violates the state law requiring an individual – regardless of profession or clerical duty – to report suspected child abuse, the violation does not allow a civil remedy.

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Theologically, Jehovah’s Witnesses are a cult of Christianity. The oppressive organization does not represent historical, Biblical Christianity in any way.

Sociologically, it is a destructive cult whose false teachings frequently result in spiritual and psychological abuse, as well as needless deaths.

In order to be able to support its unbiblical doctrines, the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization has created it’s own version of the Bible. The so-called “New World Translation” is rejected by all Christian denominations.

The court did not specifically decide if the Wilton elders violated RSA 169-C:29 – a key charge of the sisters. Even if the court had ruled on the point, the statute of limitations has expired.

Because the court decided a civil suit is impermissible, it declined to review whether Jehovah Witnesses’ elders qualified as clergy, another aspect of the sisters’ suit. Their attorney had argued that because Jehovah elders are not trained as clergy, they are not covered by religious protection.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Broderick and Justices Joseph Nadeau and James Duggan supported the lower court; Justice Linda Dalianis concurred in part but dissented on one core matter in the suit.

Her dissent focused on the legal principle that private citizens cannot be held responsible for the unanticipated criminal acts of third parties. Unlike her colleagues, Dalianis found the Wilton congregation did fall under a special circumstances exception: By not acting it had helped facilitate Paul Berry’s criminal misconduct.

“The elders instructed Poisson not to report the abuse. . . . It is not unreasonable to infer that Berry continued abusing the plaintiffs, his daughters, safe in the knowledge that Poisson was not going to report him to secular authorities,” Dalianis wrote in her dissent.

The sisters claimed they had a special relationship with the Wilton congregation and the Watchtower body, and thus the church had a duty to protect them. But the court majority ruled that no such relationship existed because church attendance is not compulsory, the sisters were not under the custody of the church, and the abuse did not occur on church property.

“Although their positions in the Wilton Congregation invested them with a strong moral obligation to do all reasonably possible to stop the abuse, it would be inappropriate to transform a moral obligation into a common law duty,” Broderick wrote for the majority.

The majority, though, placed fault on Poisson. She had “her own independent and overarching duty to protect her children from abuse perpetrated by her husband and had a common law obligation to intervene regardless of any advice she received,” Broderick wrote.

Brewer, now 26, was abused while she was 4 to 10 years old. She lived with her family in Greenville. The state had initially sought charges against Paul Berry for sexually assaulting Heather Berry, now 23, when she no older than 3. The Telegraph typically does not identify victims of sexual abuse, but the sisters opted to go public.

Hamilton said New Hampshire should consider extending the statute of limitations on the abuse reporting law, or having a window of time in which the statute is suspended. Other states have taken such measures, and once legislators discover the degree of harm tight statutes can cause, they are willing to change the law, she said.

Vacation? Short break? Day trip? Get Skip-the-line tickets at GetYourGuide.


(Listed if other than Religion News Blog, or if not shown above)
The Nashua Telegraph, USA
July 16, 2005
Albert McKeon, Telegraph Staff

Religion News Blog posted this on Sunday July 17, 2005.
Last updated if a date shows here:


More About This Subject


Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission -- at no additional cost to you -- for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate, Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this research service free of charge.

Speaking of which: One way in which you can support us — at no additional cost to you — is by shopping at