Row greets Canadian ruling on sharia law dispute

Debate flared in Canada’s Islamic and legal communities over a provincial report which critics said could create sharia law for Muslims and threaten the country’s secular legal tradition.

The study commissioned by Ontario’s provincial government ruled that Muslims have the right to seek religious mediation and arbitration for family disputes.

Former Ontario attorney general Marion Boyd said in the report issued Monday that such a system did not infringe Canadian and provincial law, under which partners can agree to bypass the legal system for arbitration.

Boyd argued that allowing religious arbitration did not entail setting up a parallel system of law for Muslims in Canada .

But she warned any attempt to compel someone to submit to religious arbitration would offend Canada’s founding principles.

“A policy of compelling people to submit to different legal regimes on the basis of religion or culture would be counter to” Canada’s bill of rights, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Boyd wrote.

“Equality before and under the law, and the existence of a single legal regime available to all Ontarians are the cornerstones of our liberal democratic society.”


Boyd was asked by the province of Ontario to consider the practice by the Islamic Institute for Civil Justice (IICJ) of applying Muslim principles to adjudicate marital and inheritance disputes.

Roman Catholic and Jewish religious officials have also previously adjudicated in the arbitration of some family disputes in the province.

Opponents of the system fear that Muslim women may be forced to waive their rights under Canadian law that are not equally protected in Islamic law.


They also question whether the practice will increase hostility towards Muslims from Canadians who already believe the values of their country are threatened by a parallel religious-based legal systems.

“It will not feed into positive feelings for Muslims,” Alia Hogben, executive director of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women told AFP.

“She has been politically correct … why go there when Canadian law is all right for Muslims to live under?”

The Council said Boyd’s ruling was problematic because there was no cohesive set of Muslim laws applicable worldwide, and warned that conservative clerics could impose a draconian interpretation of sharia in Canada .

The Muslim Canadian Congress also condemned the move, and spokesman Tarek Fateh was quoted as saying by the Toronto Star that Boyd had “given legitimacy and credibility to the right-wing racists who fundamentally are against equal rights for men and women.”

But Boyd argued in Toronto on Monday that she was not judging sharia law — “this is Muslim principles within Canadian law,” she said — and avoided any reference to the word “sharia.”

However, the IICJ greeted her ruling as a benchmark for how law based on the principles of Islam could be applied in a secular society.

“It’s a model for the whole world to see how sharia law can be used in a western society,” the group’s lawyer Syed Mumtaz Ali told the Toronto Star newspaper.

Boyd’s report included 46 recommendations, several designed to ensure that women could not be forced to enter religious arbitration for instance, in the case of a divorce.

She said mediators should screen each partner before arbitration started to ensure the process was voluntary and not the product of domestic violence or intimidation.

We appreciate your support


AFFILIATE LINKS

Our website includes affiliate links, which means we get a small commission — at no additional cost to you — for each qualifying purpose. For instance, as an Amazon Associate Religion News Blog earns from qualifying purchases. That is one reason why we can provide this service free of charge.

Source

(Listed if other than Religion News Blog)
AFP, France
Dec. 21, 2005
canada.news.designerz.com

More About This Subject

This post was last updated: Monday, November 30, -0001 at 12:00 AM, Central European Time (CET)