Doctors at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib used their medical knowledge to help devise coercive interrogation methods for detainees including sleep deprivation, stress positions and other abuse, it was reported yesterday.
An article in the New England Journal of Medicine provides the most authoritative account so far that doctors were active participants in the abuse of prisoners in America’s “war on terror”.
“Clearly, the medical personnel who helped to develop and execute aggressive counter-resistance plans thereby breached the laws of war,” says the article, which is based on interviews with more than two dozen military personnel and recently released official documents. It adds: “The conclusion that doctors participated in torture is premature, but there is probable cause for suspecting it.”
The issue that the administration had encouraged the use of coercive interrogation techniques was raised yesterday in the Senate confirmation hearings of Alberto Gonzales, the presidential nominee for attorney general. Mr Gonzales was attacked for a memo which said only the most severe types of torture were not permissible under US law.
The article accuses doctors of violating professional ethics by passing detainee health records to military intelligence, and by watching interrogation sessions.
It also describes collaboration with interrogators in which doctors and medics helped set the parameters for abuse, determining 72-hour “sleep management” schedules for detainees, approving bread and water regimens for those subjected to “dietary manipulation”, and sanctioning long periods of isolation.
At Guantanamo and at Abu Ghraib in Iraq, doctors had the final say on the interrogation plan for each detainee. “The medic would screen him and ensure he was fit for interrogation … After that the medic would watch over the interrogation from behind the glass,” the article quotes a military police commander as saying.
Last August an article in the British medical journal the Lancet accused medics at Abu Ghraib of failing to report the beating of detainees and of forging death certificates. But the practices described yesterday suggest for the first time that medical practitioners played an active role in abuse.
“This is physicians and psychiatrists being involved in the design and implementation of interrogation plans,” said Jonathan Marks, a British barrister and fellow at the Georgetown University law centre, who co-authored the report.
There was no comment from the US military yesterday, but the article includes comments from the deputy assistant secretary of defence for health, David Tornberg, which suggest the Pentagon believes professional ethics do not apply in a time of war. That view has raised concern in the medical community. “You have to protect physicians from being … used to serve military purposes,” said Leonard Rubinstein, director of Physicians for Human Rights.
Abu Ghraib abuse defendant Charles Graner faces a court martial today in Texas for his alleged role in the scandal, and is expected to argue that he was following orders from superiors. He faces more than 17 years in prison on charges that include conspiracy to mistreat detainees, dereliction of duty and assault.
Special report from The Guardian: Guantanamo Bay
Jan. 7, 2005
Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington