Previous entry: People different from us
Next entry: The Moonies are here
Related
Advertisements *
Advertise Here *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Scientology security guard kills man who wielded swords
- Beatles bigger than Jesus? Just a Lennon joke: Vatican paper
- Presiding FLDS elder, two other sect members indicted
- Attorney stymied by anti-polygamy activist’s TV demand
- Arkansas judge keeps 20 children associated with evangelist Alamo in state care
- Nigeria sees rise in number of children accussed of witchcraft
- Five leaders of Muslim charity convicted in terrorism financing trial
- India puts Witchcraft on school curriculum in effort to combat superstition-related murders
- Man killed at Hollywood Scientology center had made prior threats, police say
- Swordsman Had Threatened Scientology Before
Alleged Elizabeth Smart kidnapper pleads not guilty
More articles on this topic: Brian Mitchell and Wanda BarzeeAccused Elizabeth Smart kidnapper Brian David Mitchell stood at a podium in 3rd District Court Thursday and repeated the words, “Not guilty,” six times as Judge Judith Atherton read the charges against him.
The judge then scheduled a three-week trial, set to begin Feb. 1, 2005.
Meanwhile, defense attorney Kim Clark said she plans to file numerous pre-trial motions, including several aimed at suppressing evidence, and some motions that will require testimony to be taken.
Clark also said she plans to investigate the state grand jury process that resulted in an indictment against Mitchell, which was unsealed Wednesday. The six felonies in the indictment replace the six charges originally brought against Mitchell, 50, by the Salt Lake District Attorney’s Office.
Mitchell’s wife and co-defendant Wanda Eileen Barzee, 58, also was indicted, but her case is on hold while she receives mental health treatment at the Utah State Hospital. Mitchell was found competent on Tuesday.
Clark said she rejected the grand jury indictment and requested a preliminary hearing for Mitchell a sort of mini-trial at which prosecutors must present enough evidence to meet a probable cause standard that a crime occurred and the defendant committed it. A preliminary hearing also allows the defense to test the credibility of witnesses.
Prosecutors claim a defendant prosecuted by an indictment is not entitled to a preliminary hearing, also called a probable cause hearing which means Elizabeth will not have to testify until trial.
Clark sought to postpone Thursday’s arraignment, and the entering of Mitchell’s pleas, saying she wanted time to investigate challenges to the indictment process. Clark added that because state grand juries are so seldom used, she was unfamiliar with her options.
Atherton denied Clark’s requests, noting that the grand jury process requires proof to a “clear and convincing” level, which is higher than the probable cause standard required at a preliminary hearing.
Atherton also set a schedule for attorneys to file briefs on anticipated motions. At a Dec. 3 scheduling hearing, Atherton will set hearings to argue those motions.
Mitchell and Barzee allegedly kidnapped Elizabeth Smart, then 14, at knifepoint from her Federal Heights home on June 5, 2002. She was allegedly held captive for nine months.
Elizabeth’s father, Ed Smart, attended Thursday’s hearing, but did not comment for news reporters.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: People different from us Next entry: The Moonies are here
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
