Skip to main content.
A non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Home | About RNB Related: Cult FAQ | Cult Experts | Apologetics Index | Cult Information Search Engine
More articles about: Science and Religion:

Local Activists Face Off in Creationism Debate

Berkeley Daily Planet, USA
Mar. 23, 2004
Richard Brenneman • Tuesday March 23, 2004

With the battle over teaching evolution in Americas schools erupting yet again, two Berkeley activists stand at the vanguard of the opposing sides on the legal, legislative, and mass media battlefields of the nation.

At the forefront of the fight to reinstate the image of a divinely created humanity in public school textbooks and the public imagination stands Phillip Johnson, emeritus professor of law at UC Berkeley. Speaking of that nationwide effort, Johnson says, My fingerprints are on it.

Leading the effort to keep creationism out of public schools is Eugenie Scott, a physical anthropologist and Berkeley resident.

Scott has headed the Oakland-based National Center for Science Education since 1987, the year the U.S. Supreme Court struck down state laws mandating textbooks give creationism equal time with evolution. Four years later, Johnson entered the fray with the first in a series of anti-Darwinian books. With Darwin on Trialwhich, he says, has sold a few hundred thousand copies and has been translated into a few languagesthe Berkeley legal scholar established himself as the leading advocate of what he calls Intelligent Design.

Johnsons efforts are being funded by Roberta and Howard F. Ahmanson Jr., the couple to whom he dedicated his second book (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds). Heirs to the Home Savings of America fortune, the Ahmansons are Christian Reconstructionists, a sect who have been accused of believing that their co-religionists should impose a reign of biblical law in America that would demand death for non-Christian proselytizers, adulterers, gays, witches and rebellious children.

While the law and public policy have favored Scotts side in recent years, repeated polling has revealed the United States as the most religious nation on earth. According to a 1991 poll of the U.S., 16 European countries, Israel and the Phillipines conducted by the International Social Survey Program, only in Poland and the Philippines were more people convinced of the existence of God than in America. Americans led in belief in miracles, hell, and the deviland only the Irish topped the Americans in belief in heaven. In no other country besides the United States did a smaller percentage of the populace accept evolution as a fact (the now-defunct East Germany topped the list of evolutionists, followed by Great Britain and West Germany, all with more than twice the rate of America.)

Repeated polling also shows that belief in evolution rises with education and income level.

Johnsons creationist views are being challenged by who he calls the high priests of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the entire scientific hierarchy which has a tremendous interest in maintaining belief in a naturalist, materialist creation story and who say your only source should be the mandarins of science.

In October, 2002, the AAAS board declared that the lack of scientific warrant for so-called intelligent design theory makes it improper to include as part of a science education. And in a Feb. 9 letter to Ohio state officials, NAS President Bruce Alberts declared that Intelligent Design is not scientific because its ultimate tenet that life on earth is the result of some intelligent being is scientifically untestable and therefore cannot be invalidated through scientific means.

Johnsons greatest obstacle is that Intelligent Design hasnt made the slightest headway in the scientific literature.

Nobody is using Intelligent Design in applied science, Scott says. Nobodys using it to understand scientific phenomena, which is the only purpose of a scientific theory. Theyre not being accepted in the scientific community. In addition, Scott adds, no public schools have yet mandated teaching Intelligent Design.

Theyve had more success in getting pieces in newspapers like the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, Scott acknowledges. It sounds much more attractive than Young Earth creationism.

But the real battle lines are drawn around the nations schools, where Scott has another ally in Berkeley.

To Molleen Matsumura, who serves on the national board of Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AUSC), the classroom evolutionary battle is but one skirmish in a broader cultural war, in which the struggle over faith-based initiatives is an even greater concern.

While creationism remains the standard in the increasingly cash-strapped public schools, moves to implement school vouchers at the national and state levels could move more students into taxpayer-funded religious schools, where Darwin is banned and Bishop Ussher reigns. This is the real battleground, Matsumura says.

AUSC also worries about federal judicial nominations, because a lot of these [church/state] issues get decided in the courts, Matsumura said.

And it was in a courtroom, during the first great multimedia Trial of the [20th] Century, that the most famous battle between science and creationism was waged when Dayton, TN, public school teacher John Scopes was prosecuted 79 years ago for the crime of teaching Darwin.

While the law under which Scopes was convicted was revoked in 1967, it took a federal court ruling two years ago to end Bible classes in Daytons public schools.

For more information on the web, see the National Center for Science Educations site at, the Discovery Institutes Center for Science & Culture at and Americans United for Separation of Church and State at

info Original content is © Copyright Religion News Blog. All rights reserved.
    Do not republish or repost. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

share this article Share this article

tag Related Articles


Comment Comment

Join Religion News Blog at Google+ to comment, share, and follow.

RSS Feed Follow Us


Religion News You May Like This As Well

Why are you not using Nozbe?

Don't you need to get things done?

Religion News Search Search Religion News Blog