Skip to main content.
A non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Home | About RNB Related: Cult FAQ | Cult Experts | Apologetics Index | Cult Information Search Engine
More articles about: Jehovah's Witnesses:

Annandale church isn’t liable in abuse suit

Star Tribune, USA
Mar. 10, 2004
Pam Louwagie • Wednesday March 10, 2004

A Jehovah’s Witnesses congregation in Annandale, Minn., isn’t liable if one of its members sexually abused two child congregants more than a decade ago, a Minnesota Court of Appeals panel ruled Tuesday.

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Theologically, Jehovah’s Witnesses are a cult of Christianity. The oppressive organization does not represent historical, Biblical Christianity in any way. Sociologically, it is a destructive cult whose false teachings frequently result in spiritual and psychological abuse, as well as needless deaths.

Though congregation elders had received a prior complaint of abuse and didn’t immediately report it to authorities, according to the ruling, the organization wasn’t responsible for protecting two of its members who claim they were abused by the same person later.

The two girls, now adults living in Twin Cities suburbs, sued in 2002. They claim they were abused in the late 1980s and early 1990s and argue that they followed the organization’s doctrine to report their concerns to elders — not law enforcement or anyone else. Elders at the Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses congregation told them to stay silent or risk losing membership, they claim.

The women say the organization’s rules prevented them from protecting themselves and gave the organization a legal duty to protect them.

But in an opinion written by Judge Robert Schumacher and decided with judges Bruce Willis and Wilhelmina Wright, the court ruled that the organization didn’t have control or custody of the girls when the alleged abuse happened. Incidents were alleged to have taken place on a snowmobile, in an automobile and at the alleged perpetrator’s house, not at a Jehovah’s Witnesses function or on the organization’s property, the panel reasoned.

St. Paul attorney Jeffrey Anderson, who is representing the two women, said the ruling came as “a deep disappointment” and he expects his clients will appeal.

Anderson said he thinks the ruling gives Jehovah’s Witnesses the freedom to live by their own laws and not the rule of mandatory reporting.

“I’m concerned that if somehow they can’t be held to account for failure to report child abuse, what is the significance of having the law?” Anderson said.

An attorney for the Jehovah’s Witnesses congregation couldn’t be reached for comment.

info Original content is © Copyright Religion News Blog. All rights reserved.
    Do not republish or repost. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

share this article Share this article

tag Related Articles


Comment Comment

Join Religion News Blog at Google+ to comment, share, and follow.

RSS Feed Follow Us


Religion News You May Like This As Well

Why are you not using Nozbe?

Don't you need to get things done?

Religion News Search Search Religion News Blog