Related
Translate
Previous entry: Pastor Accused OF Killing Boy Pleads Not Guilty
Next entry: Harry Potter series tops national banned-book list
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Guyana’s Jonestown suicide site gets plaque
- Scientology practices ‘putting people at risk’
- Recession: Muslim schools in UK under threat of closure
- Australian senator tells Parliament of widespread criminal conduct within the Church of Scientology
- World’s oldest ocean-going passenger ship, ministry ship Doulos, to stop sailing
- When a child dies, faith is no defense
- Israel Charges Extremist With Attempted Murder Of Messianic Family
- Scientology’s feet held to the fire in Australia: Struggle between a church and the state
- 1-year prison term for man who participated in cyber attack on Church of Scientology Web sites
- Australian police take up complaints about Scientology
High court refuses appeal by Jehovah’s Witness
More articles on this topic: Jehovah's WitnessesEthicist says girl had right to refuse blood transfusions
EDMONTON – The Supreme Court of Canada will not hear an appeal from a young Jehovah’s Witness who at age 16 had a court-ordered blood transfusion against her wishes.
Candice Unland of Morinville, who turns 21 next week, said the decision is very disappointing, but she predicted the issue will not die.
“Eventually the court is going to have to face it,” she said Saturday.
Unland’s lawyer, Shane Brady, said the Supreme Court hears fewer than 15 per cent of all appeals and never explains why it does not hear cases.
The Charter of Rights clearly gives an 18-year-old patient the right to refuse a transfusion. Unland’s appeal would have argued that a mature 16-year-old has the same Charter protection, Brady said. The problem was that the Alberta Court of Appeal refused to hear this argument, and the Alberta government opposed the Unland appeal, saying an issue not before the provincial appeal court should not be raised at the Supreme Court.
Brady said another case may one day raise this Charter issue at the Supreme Court.
Two prominent medical experts filed affidavits with the Supreme Court arguing Unland should not have been compelled to have a blood transfusion when she was 16.
The court-ordered transfusion contradicted a key principle of the medical ethics, which gives mature minors the right to decide what medical treatments they will receive unless their competence is compromised, University of Alberta bioethicist Dr. Paul Byrne said.
This principle applies to capable minors as well as adults, agreed Dr. Austin Richard Cooper, chairman of pediatrics at Memorial University and chief of the child health program at Newfoundland’s Janeway Children’s Health and Rehabilitation Centre.
Lower Alberta courts acknowledged Unland was a mature minor, but decided the child welfare law permitted a judge to order a transfusion.
Unland said she didn’t want a transfusion during her operation to stop excessive menstrual bleeding because she believes the Bible does not allow one person to take blood from another. She also feared catching a blood-borne disease such hepatitis or AIDS.
Unland has also continued her fight in support of Bethany Hughes, a Calgary Jehovah’s Witness who died of leukemia last year at 17 after an unsuccessful court battle to refuse the 38 transfusions she received during cancer treatment. Hughes had also argued she was a mature minor when she tried to stop the transfusions.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: Pastor Accused OF Killing Boy Pleads Not Guilty Next entry: Harry Potter series tops national banned-book list
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
