Skip to main content.
A non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Home | About RNB Related: Cult FAQ | Cult Experts | Apologetics Index | Cult Information Search Engine
More articles about: Scientology:

Kennedy Takes Aim at Ritalin Provision • Wednesday May 7, 2003

Roll Call, May 7, 2003
By Emily Pierce, Roll Call Staff

Psychiatrists and at least one lawmaker are taking on the Church of Scientologys support for a provision in a House special education bill that seeks to prevent teachers from requiring students to take medication for attention-deficit disorder.

Its a wolf in sheeps clothing, said Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) of the provision that was added to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act reauthorization, which passed the House last week. I suspect it probably had its antecedents in the community that believes that all medication for kids with [attention-deficit disorder] is wrong.

Kennedy and members of the psychiatric profession say the provision, which has been aggressively backed by the Scientology-founded Citizens Commission on Human Rights, is an attempt to achieve what opponents charge is Scientologys broader goal of abolishing the field of psychiatry altogether.

The provision, sponsored by freshman Rep. Max Burns (R-Ga.) and supported by Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), is intended to address highly publicized cases in several states of teachers pressuring parents to medicate children with Ritalin and other psychotropic drugs.

Burns said he was aware that the provision was backed by CCHR, but said his goals were far different from those of the Church of Scientology and CCHR, which dispute the American Psychiatric Associations determination that attention-deficit/hyper-activity disorder, or ADHD, is a medical condition that sometimes requires medication.

I did not go out and solicit that support, said Burns. Were not trying to take away the scientifically based treatments that we have. But we dont want to over-diagnose or misuse some of these treatments.

Another group supporting the provision is the largely grassroots Parents for Label and Drug-Free Education, which has chapters in several states and has been working closely with CCHR. President Bushs brother, Neil Bush, has also publicized the issue of misdiagnosed ADHD through his education technology company, Ignite! Learning, which he founded in 2001 after his son, Pierce, was erroneously diagnosed with the disorder.

But psychiatric organizations that oppose the provision including the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the American Psychiatric Association, the Federation of Families for Childrens Mental Health, the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, and the National Mental Health Association claim supporters have been duped into supporting a measure that they say could prevent teachers from even talking to parents about the possibility of their child being evaluated by a mental health professional.

Its all an organized campaign to discredit the mental health profession and disavow the existence of childhood mental disorders, said Clarke Ross, CEO of the nonprofit Children and Adults with Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder.

CCHR spokeswoman Marla Filidei countered that her organization has been fighting for the provision because of hundreds of stories from parents about teachers and school districts that have urged or pressured parents to put their nonattentive children on drugs, such as Ritalin, to address what may be simple behavior problems or the boredom of a gifted child.

Were not saying behaviors dont manifest themselves in some ways. Were saying its not medical, said Filidei. This is a list of disorders that were voted into existence by the American Psychiatric Association.

CCHRs Web site states that the group was formed in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and State University of New York psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz to combat psychiatrys oppression and to expose and help abolish any and all physically damaging practices in the field of mental healing.

Filidei said CCHRs ultimate goal is for the mental health profession and those who support it to admit that there is no medical evidence to support these disorders.

Psychiatric professional organizations say they have been placed in the untenable position of trying to block a measure that they acknowledge appears to be well-intentioned.

Were not opposed to the policy objective that no school should require children to be on medication, said Ross, whose group is funded in part by pharmaceutical companies, including the makers of Ritalin. Its put [us] in an awkward defensive position, and thats what were hearing from legislators, that Well, Im not going to be the one to stand up and oppose this.

Kennedy agreed that it was difficult for lawmakers to come out strongly in opposition to the provision.

I think people can dismiss this as an innocuous amendment that on a superficial level sounds reasonable, said Kennedy. [But] it was obviously written with the intended effect of stopping kids from getting the needed treatment thats out there.

Still, opponents of the provision are hoping to find allies in the Senate to prevent the provision from becoming law.

One lobbyist for the psychiatric profession said they have already targeted a number of Democrats on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, such as Sens. Edward Kennedy (Mass.) and Jeff Bingaman (N.M.). Psychiatric groups also plan to contact Republicans friendly to the mental health profession, such as Sens. Pete Domenici (N.M.) and John Warner (Va.).

Theyre not too worried about it getting into the Senate [Individuals with Disabilities Education Act] bill, the lobbyist said of conversations with Kennedys staff. Conference committee is where well be focused in the end.

The lobbyist acknowledged that inclusion of the measure in the IDEA bill caught the psychiatric community off-guard. They are now working diligently against it, but still appear to have an uphill battle.

Burns and other proponents of the legislation say there is a national problem of teachers pushing Ritalin and other ADHD drugs.

Filidei noted as one example the case of Patricia Weathers, who has been travelling with Filidei to lobby the issue in Congress. Weathers heads the New York chapter of Parents for Label and Drug-Free Education.

Weathers said her son was having trouble reading when officials at the public school he was attending told Weathers to put him on medication for learning-disabled children.

Weathers said she complied at first, but that negative side effects caused her to terminate the treatment. When she took her son off the medication, Weathers said the school called child welfare officials who threatened to charge her with medical neglect of her son.

Weathers said she escaped legal action, however, by obtaining a letter from a private psychiatric professional who asserted her right to explore alternative therapies for her son.

Theres no evidence that its an actual abnormality, said Weathers. And the school didnt let me know that I was labeling my son as mentally ill by putting him on medication.

Its stories such as Weathers that prompted 19 states and now the federal government to pursue laws prohibiting teachers from requiring students to take psychotropic medications. Five states Connecticut, Illinois, Minnesota, Utah and Virginia have enacted laws designed to protect parents rights to refuse to medicate their children, according to CCHR.

However, both sides agree that there are no national statistics on how prevalent the practice is.

Kennedy argued that the problem is not as widespread as CCHR makes it seem.

Clearly, its a legitimate issue, but as I said, its a mischaracterization of the situation to think that its not the exception rather than the rule, he said.

The question is whether this is a national issue that requires a national bureaucracy, added Ross. Its all based on these highly publicized situations. … [Weathers] situation is a very sad experience, but whether Patricia Weathers experience is typical thats just not been our families experience.

Filidei disputed that notion. Its ludicrous to say that legislators would be passing laws based on isolated incidents, she said.

info Original content is © Copyright Religion News Blog. All rights reserved.
    Do not republish or repost. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

share this article Share this article

tag Related Articles

arrow Topic(s): Scientology

Comment Comment

Join Religion News Blog at Google+ to comment, share, and follow.

RSS Feed Follow Us


Religion News You May Like This As Well

Why are you not using Nozbe?

Don't you need to get things done?

Religion News Search Search Religion News Blog