Skip to main content.
A non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news
ReligionNewsBlog

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Home | About RNB Related: Cult FAQ | Cult Experts | Apologetics Index | Cult Information Search Engine
More articles about: State:

Supreme Court declines to review San Diego church-state case


ReligionNewsBlog.com • Tuesday April 22, 2003

AP, Apr. 21, 2003
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nevada/2003/apr/21/042110583.html
By GINA HOLLAND, ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) – The city of San Diego lost a government religion case Monday when the Supreme Court refused to consider whether city leaders wrongly sold a cross in a park to a memorial association.

An appeals court said San Diego violated the California Constitution in 1998 when it sold the 43-foot cross on a city-owned war memorial at Mount Soledad and a half-acre of land for $106,000 to the nonprofit Mount Soledad Memorial Association.

San Diego attorney Casey Gwinn told justices the city had “remained scrupulously neutral toward religion.” The court refused without comment to review the city’s appeal and a separate appeal filed by the memorial association.

“The purpose of the cross and its message to a reasonable observer is to connote peace, solemnity, and reverence for those who have risked and given their lives to defend our nation and the principles for which it stands. Were it otherwise, many national cemeteries, including the crosses at Arlington National Cemetery, would also have to be deemed unconstitutional,” Gwinn wrote in a court filing.

The city had been sued by Vietnam veteran Philip Paulson, a San Diego atheist who accused leaders of violating the constitutional separation of church and state by having a Christian symbol in a city park.

Paulson’s attorneys had argued that the city did not give groups that wanted to dismantle the cross a fair chance to bid on the property.

The cases are San Diego v. Paulson, 02-1093, and Mt. Soledad Memorial Association v. Paulson, 02-1101.

info Original content is © Copyright Religion News Blog. All rights reserved.
    Do not republish or repost. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

share this article Share this article

tag Related Articles

arrow
arrow Topic(s): State

Comment Comment

Join Religion News Blog at Google+ to comment, share, and follow.

RSS Feed Follow Us


 Follow

Religion News You May Like This As Well

Why are you not using Nozbe?

Don't you need to get things done?

Religion News Search Search Religion News Blog