Related
Advertisements *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
![]() |
![]() Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Ayah Pin, leader of Sky Kingdom cult, living in Thailand
- Judge won’t stop hearing on FLDS sect land sale
- Thousands of polygamous sect members show up for court hearing
- Polygamist leader Warren Jeffs faces new sex assault charge
- Australia: Kingdom of Yahweh sect declares itself above law and constitution
- Jury awards $2.5 million to teen beaten by Klan members
- Evangelist Ted Haggard returns to the pulpit in Illinois
- Peoples Temple: pain of cult massacre lives on
- Opinion writer spouts misinformation about the term ‘cult’
- Religious cult member convicted but viewed as victim of cult leader
Supreme Court upholds Virginia ban on cross burning
Rejected free speech arguments
CNN, Apr. 7, 2003
http://www.cnn.com/
WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Supreme Court Monday upheld key portions of a 50-year-old Virginia law banning cross burnings where the intent is racial intimidation.
But it struck down a provision of the law which declared that any cross burning is on its face evidence of intimidation.
The closely divided court rejected arguments that the practice of burning crosses is a constitutional form of free speech.
The 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor splintered both the more liberal and conservative wings of the Supreme Court.
O’Connor was joined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Associate Justices Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer in key portions of the ruling.
“We conclude that while a state consistent with the First Amendment may ban cross burning carried out with the intent to intimidate, the provision in the Virginia statute treating any cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate renders the statute unconstitutional,” the ruling said.
In dissent, the court’s only African-American justice, Clarence Thomas, said he agreed with the majority that states may ban cross burnings, but disagreed they could ever represent free speech.
Thomas said cross burning already constitutes an illegal act of intimidation, and therefore does not need to be seen as a test of free speech.
“This statute prohibits only conduct, not expression,” Thomas said. “Just as one cannot burn down someone’s house to make a political point and then seek refuge in the First Amendment, those who hate cannot terrorize and intimidate to make their point,” he said.
The Ku Klux Klan and its sympathizers, during what Thomas described as “a reign of terror,” for decades set crosses ablaze in ceremonies.
Fourteen states and the District of Columbia have passed statutes that prohibit cross burning.
Share this
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
Article and Site Tools
» PermaLink to: Supreme Court upholds Virginia ban on cross burning Need a shorter link? You can remove everything after the final / » More news articles + news archive on Hate Groups » More religion and cult news Subscribe (RSS / Email) [What is RSS?] » RSS News Feed - All Topics: Religion News Blog RSS Feed » RSS News Feed - Single Topic: Hate Groups » Headlines by Email: Daily Religion News Blog Headlines |
More Article Tools
Bookmark / Tag: Del.icio.us Bookmark / Tag: Furl Save this article Email this article Print this article [Temporarily out of order] More Information Books about Hate Groups Relevant books (and other goodies) |



