Alamo’s defense attorney, John Wesley Hall Jr. of Little Rock, told Justices Kermit Bye, C. Arlen Beam and Lavenski Smith that Alamo deserves a new trial or, at the very least, to be resentenced by a different judge.
“Even a properly instructed jury sometimes gets it wrong and this is one of those cases,” Hall said.
Hall described as speculation the jury’s conviction of Alamo on all 10 counts in a federal indictment alleging the transportation of five young women he wed as children across state lines for sex.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Kyra Jenner told the court there was no need for speculation.
“The record is replete with the testimony of these five young women who made it very clear that Mr. Alamo had one reason for having them in his company and that was to be his sexual companions,” Jenner said.
Hall argued Alamo wasn’t present on some of the trips taken by the victims and that sex was incidental to the travel and not a dominant purpose as the law requires.
“The inescapable fact here is that all of these young girls were under the complete control of the defendant,” Jenner said. “He controlled how they moved, he controlled what they ate, he placed them on fasts to punish them, he controlled where they could go … .”
- Source / Full Story: Alamo defense, prosecutors go head to head in court again, Lynn LaRowe, Texarkana Gazette via TonyAlamoNews.com, Sep. 22, 2010 — Summarized by Religion News Blog