Skip to main content.
Religion News Blog is a non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news
ReligionNewsBlog

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Navigation:
Home | Site Menu | About RNB | RNB Store | Cult FAQ | Cult Experts | Apologetics Index | Cult Information Search Engine
A Random Image


 Search



 Share & Follow Religion News Blog


 Remember These Stories?


 Amazon

More articles about: Interfaith:

Feel-good interfaith events may paper over deep differences


ReligionNewsBlog.com • Monday August 5, 2002

Inside the First Amendment
By Charles Haynes
Senior scholar, First Amendment Center
FreedomForum.org, Aug. 4, 2002
http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=16660

The lid is off.

In the long shadow of Sept. 11, Americans are rediscovering what most of the world has never forgotten: Religious differences matter.

Last month the Rev. David Benke was suspended from his leadership position in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod for taking part in an interfaith prayer service at Yankee Stadium after the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

His offense? In a New York Times article July 10, a church official explained that praying with pagans, Muslims, Hindus “was an offense both to God and to all Christians.”

It was bound to happen.

For nearly 11 months now, political leaders have tried to unite America with well-meaning (but glib) statements affirming all religions – and insisting that religion has nothing to do with terrorism. And we’ve had innumerable interfaith prayer services with watered-down “to-whom-it-may-concern” prayers.

All of these (well-intentioned) efforts paper over deep religious differences. In reality, for most Jews, Christians, Muslims and others it does matter what you believe – it matters not only for this life, but for all eternity. And it matters how you pray (and to whom).

Ignoring religious differences doesn’t work. Now comes the inevitable backlash from people angry about “feel-good” attempts at religious unity. And it’s not a pretty sight.

At a gathering of Southern Baptist pastors in June, the Rev. Jerry Vines decided to take the gloves off. He called Islam’s prophet Muhammad “a demon-possessed pedophile.”
[...]

A third alternative is for Americans to address religious differences honestly and civilly – while simultaneously ensuring that people of all faiths or none are treated fairly in the public square.

We can do this if, and only if, we take the First Amendment seriously. That means first and foremost affirming that religious liberty is an inalienable right for every person.

The First Amendment doesn’t require anyone to “accept” the religions of other people. But it does call us to guard the right of every individual to choose in matters of faith (the right to be wrong, if you want to put it that way).

And we all have a First Amendment right to attempt to persuade others to our view – so long as we don’t use the government to coerce anyone. But we should keep in mind that how we debate is almost as important as what we debate.

Personal attacks, name-calling, ridicule and similar tactics destroy the fabric of our life together as American citizens. Civil debate – the cornerstone of a successful democracy – enables us to engage one another in ways that promote mutual understanding.

What do these First Amendment “ground rules” mean in practice?

There’s nothing wrong with (and something to be gained from) events that celebrate our “unity” in times of national crisis. But let’s not do it in a way that ignores real and important differences.
[...]

There’s also nothing wrong with (and much to be gained from) confronting religious differences that are deep and abiding. After all, we can’t deal with one another honestly if we don’t understand how we differ.

But if everyone adopted the tactics of the Rev. Vines, we’ll only deepen the divisions, ignite hatred, and encourage violence. Surely there’s a way for Christians to explain why they don’t accept Muhammad as a prophet or for Muslims to explain why they don’t view Jesus as divine without resorting to ugly and inflammatory language.

A call for more civility isn’t a call for politically correct speech that offends no one. A robust and open exchange of ideas is a vital part of any successful democracy.

But at a time when religious emotions are running high at home and abroad, we all have a civic obligation to debate our differences with civility and respect.

Bookmark share or email this Religion News Blog page Bookmark, Share, or Email This Page

 

Read another article Read Another Article

Tags and keywords for this Apologetics Index entry Related News Articles

arrow Topic(s): Interfaith
arrow

RSS Feed Subscribe to Religion News Blog updates

Religion News Find Related Information

Use our custom search engines to find additional research resources on religions and cults:
arrow ApologeticsSearch.com: Search for apologetics articles, books, videos, and other research resources across 135 Christian apologetics websites and blogs.
arrow CounterCultSearch.com: Search for information about (religious) cults, cult-like organizations, and cults experts -- as well as paranormal-, New Age, and pseudoscientific claims -- across 260+ websites, blogs and forums dedicated to cult research, spiritual abuse, ex-cult counseling & support.

Religion News Find Related Religion & Spirituality Books at Amazon.com

Religion News Possibly related... or Most Popular Religion News Articles

Religion News Search Search Religion News Blog