Related
Translate
Previous entry: Transgender woman sues Catholic hospital
Next entry: The joy of sects, Tom Cruise style
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Guyana’s Jonestown suicide site gets plaque
- Scientology practices ‘putting people at risk’
- Recession: Muslim schools in UK under threat of closure
- Australian senator tells Parliament of widespread criminal conduct within the Church of Scientology
- When a child dies, faith is no defense
- World’s oldest ocean-going passenger ship, ministry ship Doulos, to stop sailing
- Israel Charges Extremist With Attempted Murder Of Messianic Family
- Scientology’s feet held to the fire in Australia: Struggle between a church and the state
- 1-year prison term for man who participated in cyber attack on Church of Scientology Web sites
- Australian police take up complaints about Scientology
Sextuplets celebrate first birthday
More articles on this topic: Jehovah's WitnessesBRITISH COLUMBIA – Canada’s first sextuplets were born at B.C. Women and Children’s Hospital a year ago today, launching a continuing debate that pits religious beliefs against the government’s legal responsibility to protect children.
The premature babies, two of whom died shortly after birth, were born to a Jehovah’s Witness family whose identity was protected by a court-imposed ban on publicity.
Although doctors wanted to give blood transfusions to the four surviving babies, the family protested because the medical procedure contravenes their religious beliefs that Christians must “abstain from blood.”
The four surviving infants were apprehended by the B.C. Ministry of Children and Family Development in order for the transfusions to be performed. The two boys and two girls were given one blood transfusion each.
The parents continue to protest the transfusions and apprehensions in B.C. Supreme Court, arguing that the ministry acted with undue haste when it apprehended the babies, denying them their charter rights to a judicial review before a transfusion took place, according to media reports.
- Four Dangers of the Jehovah’s Witness Organization
Ontario lawyer Shane Brady, who represents the family, has called the ministry’s actions “a gross violation” of the parents’ constitutional rights.
“In media we’ve seen statements that not everyone agrees with these parents’ religious views. But that’s not what this case is about. Any parent would be upset to learn that the government could apprehend their child and interfere with the parent relationship in important matters without having to justify it in advance,” Brady said previously.
This wasn’t the first high-profile case of a Jehovah’s Witness refusing medical treatment. In 2001, 16-year-old Bethany Hughes of Calgary made headlines nationwide after refusing to undergo blood transfusions because of her strong Jehovah’s Witness faith. Hughes died in September 2002, of leukemia after an unsuccessful court battle to refuse 38 transfusions.
In 2005, a B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled against the right of a 14-year-old Jehovah’s Witness from Vernon to refuse lifesaving blood transfusions. The girl was suffering from a potentially fatal form of bone cancer.
In her ruling, Justice Mary Boyd said the rights of a “mature minor” to make her own medical choices do not supersede the authority of the courts in British Columbia to protect her life and safety.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: Transgender woman sues Catholic hospital Next entry: The joy of sects, Tom Cruise style
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
