Topeka Capital-Journal, USA
Dec. 7, 2007
Jan Biles
cjonline.com

---

ReligionNewsBlog.com • Item 20191 • Posted: Friday December 7, 2007  

---

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis ruled Thursday that Shirley Phelps-Roper is entitled to a preliminary injunction while the constitutionality of statutes restricting where members of Topeka-based Westboro Baptist Church can picket is reviewed.

The appeals court’s decision reverses an earlier judgment by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri that denied Phelps-Roper’s’ motion for a preliminary injunction.

Phelps-Roper said Thursday that the statutes in question are murky when it comes to defining the distance church members can picket from funerals, using words like “in front of” and “about.” Because of that language, she said law enforcement officers and other officials are left open to interpret how the statutes should be enforced.

Westboro Baptist Church members believe God is punishing the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality by killing Americans, including soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

On Aug. 5, Phelps-Roper and other Westboro Baptist members picketed and protested near the location of the funeral of Army Spc. Edward Lee Myers in St. Joseph, Mo.

In response to the protest, Missouri enacted statutes that criminalize picketing “in front or about” a funeral location or procession and within 300 feet of a funeral location or procession.

The district court denied Phelps-Roper’s original motion, saying she didn’t demonstrate she was likely to succeed on its merits, didn’t demonstrate irreparable harm and the public interest weighed in favor of upholding the challenged statutory provisions, according to U.S. Appeals Court records.

Phelps-Roper said the higher court concluded she demonstrated a fair chance of prevailing on the merits of her claim and will suffer “irreparable injury” if the preliminary injunction isn’t issued.

“The reason they say irreparable injury is because it’s a First Amendment right,” she said, of the group’s picketing.

The appeals court also stated, “The injunction will not cause substantial harm to others, and the public is served by the preservation of constitutional rights.”

---

What You Can Do From Here

---

Read More Articles On These Topics Categories: Hate Groups, Religious Insanity Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article Subscribe Religion News Blog RSS feed [What is this?] RSS by topic: Hate Groups, Religious Insanity Read Another Article Previous entry: German ministers say Scientology unconstitutional Next entry: Germany: Dismay over Release of Extremist Attackers RNB Homepage with latest headlines Find Related Information Use our custom search engines to find additional research resources on religions and cults Find Related Books Hate Groups Most Popular Today Couple bites and bludgeons 13-month old to death in ‘exorcism’ Child welfare officials show up at Tony Alamo compound in California; Arkansas officials seize 6 more children How Scientologists pressurise publishers Guard who killed sword-wielder at Scientology center won’t face charges

---

Share This Article

---

To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:

• Post a link on your blog or website:
  
• Send in an email or IM:
  
• Post on a forum:
  

Search for information about (religious) cults, cult-like organizations, -- as well as paranormal-, New Age, and pseudoscientific claims -- across 260+ websites, blogs and forums dedicated to cult research, spiritual abuse, ex-cult counseling & support.

Note: results are listed on another domain -- CounterCultSearch.com -- from which you can easily return here.

Search for apologetics articles, books, videos, and other research resources across 135 Christian apologetics websites and blogs.

Note: results are listed on another domain -- ApologeticsSearch.com -- from which you can easily return here.