Related
Translate
Get RNB via RSS
|
|
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
![]() |
![]() Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Polygamist Sect Leader Convicted of Sexual Assault
- Jury takes 14 minutes to convict self-proclaimed pot pastor
- Supreme Court upholds cult AUM Shinrikyo members’ death sentences
- Newspaper continues series of exposés of Scientology cult
- Epic Mohammad movie in pipeline
- Coptic Christian Blogger in Egypt Pressured to Convert to Islam in Prison
- Italian judge convicts 23 in CIA kidnapping of Muslim cleric
- Cult leader Warren Jeffs’ attorneys argue sect leader faced wrong charge
- Texas judge limits some records in FLDS trial over polygamy references
- Photos show birthing center at sect’s Texas ranch
Judge throws out Jerry Springer – The Opera blasphemy charge
A group of Christian evangelists lost their High Court battle to prosecute BBC director-general Mark Thompson for blasphemy over the cult musical Jerry Springer – The Opera.
Two judges ruled it was reasonable to conclude that the play “in context” could not be considered as blasphemous.
They said the play “as a whole was not and could not reasonably be regarded as aimed at, or an attack on, Christianity or what Christians held sacred.”
The ruling comes as a blow to Christian Voice, which condemned the satirical show as “an offensive, spiteful, systematic mockery and wilful denigration of Christian belief” – something no one would have dreamed of making about the prophet Mohammed and Islam.
The group’s lawyers urged Lord Justice Hughes and Mr Justice Collins, sitting at the High Court in London, to allow the prosecution to go ahead.
They also wanted to prosecute the show’s producer Jonathan Thoday. He staged a nationwide tour, beginning in October 2003 at the Cambridge Theatre in London’s West End and ending at Brighton in July last year.
Christian Voice national director Stephen Green said the show “clearly crossed the blasphemy threshold.”
He applied for court orders overturning District Judge Caroline Tubbs’ refusal at the City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court in January to issue a summons against the director-general, who allowed the controversial show to be screened on BBC2 in 2005.
Refusing to intervene, the judges said of Judge Tubbs: “She was entitled to conclude that on the undisputed evidence no jury, correctly directed as to law, could properly convict.”
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Find Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:





