Related
Advertisements *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
![]() |
![]() Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Michael Guglielmucci’s wife vows to stand by him
- After 1,500 years, pagans plan Acropolis prayer
- 253 FLDS children now dropped from YFZ custody battle
- Prosecutors play taped confessions in former pastor’s trial
- ‘Psychic Healer’ Controversy
- Organisers deny Dru Yoga conference linked to cult
- Theocratic Sect Prays for Real Armageddon
- Ex-Hosanna pastor: Confession forced
- Revealed: Britain’s secret propaganda war against al-Qaida
- Muslim guilty of forcing boys to flog themselves
Jehovah’s Witnesses vs. blood transfusion: Teen takes fight to top
A teenage girl’s battle for the right to refuse blood transfusions continues.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada released a statement saying it would review the case of the Winnipeg girl, a Jehovah’s Witness, who sought to refuse blood transfusions.
Jehovah’s Witnesses object to transfusions because they interpret some biblical passages as outlawing them.
The girl, who suffers from Crohn’s disease, was taken to hospital April 16, 2006, when she was 14, for internal bleeding.
After she refused transfusions, hospital staff contacted Child and Family Services.
At a subsequent hearing, a judge ruled she was in danger of death or serious harm and ordered the hospital be allowed to treat her. The girl then received transfusions and recovered.
She later appealed the lower court ruling that would allow doctors to order transfusions without her consent. The girl sought a court order deeming her a “mature minor” in charge of her own decisions.
In front of the three Court of Appeal justices, debate concerned a section of the Child and Family Services Act that allows the agency to intervene on behalf of minors under 16 years of age.
- Four Dangers of the Jehovah’s Witness Organization
Child and Family Services opposed the girl’s appeal. In February 2007, Justice Freda Steel spoke for the Manitoba appeal court regarding its 49-page decision.
Steel said although forced medical treatment may be an infringement of one’s Charter rights, it is not contrary to the principles of justice.
“When children are treated differently than adults … this is not discriminatory as understood by the charter. Age-based distinctions are a common and necessary way of ordering society,” said Steel in the decision.
A date has not been set yet for the Supreme Court of Canada’s hearing.
In its notice released today, it gives mention to considering whether aspects of The Child and Family Services Act in Manitoba are “unconstitutional.”
Like this story?
Today's Most Popular Articles |
|
Share this
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
Article and Site Tools
» PermaLink to: Jehovah’s Witnesses vs. blood transfusion: Teen takes fight to top Need a shorter link? You can remove everything after the final / » More news articles + news archive on Jehovah's Witnesses » More religion and cult news Subscribe (RSS / Email) [What is RSS?] » RSS News Feed - All Topics: Religion News Blog RSS Feed » RSS News Feed - Single Topic: Jehovah's Witnesses » Headlines by Email: Daily Religion News Blog Headlines |
More Article Tools
Bookmark / Tag: Del.icio.us Bookmark / Tag: Furl Save this article Email this article Print this article [Temporarily out of order] More Information Books about Jehovah's Witnesses Relevant books (and other goodies) |
About Religion News Blog
Religion News Blog (RNB), published by Apologetics Index, highlights news items and other resources on world religions, cults, religious sects, alternative religions and related issues. RNB's non-profit news clipping service is used by - among others - Christian apologists, countercult professionals, anticult organizations, cult experts, teachers, religion professionals, reporters and other researchers.



