Related
Translate
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Polygamist Sect Leader Convicted of Sexual Assault
- Jury takes 14 minutes to convict self-proclaimed pot pastor
- Supreme Court upholds cult AUM Shinrikyo members’ death sentences
- Newspaper continues series of exposés of Scientology cult
- Epic Mohammad movie in pipeline
- Coptic Christian Blogger in Egypt Pressured to Convert to Islam in Prison
- Italian judge convicts 23 in CIA kidnapping of Muslim cleric
- Cult leader Warren Jeffs’ attorneys argue sect leader faced wrong charge
- Texas judge limits some records in FLDS trial over polygamy references
- Photos show birthing center at sect’s Texas ranch
Internet ordination? Judge unties the knot
More articles on this topic: Universal Life ChurchSep 12, 2007 — Dorie E. Heyer and Jacob T. Hollerbush tied the knot during a midnight ceremony Aug. 24, 2006, in their home while a friend, who had obtained an Internet ordination, officiated.
No witnesses attended the quick ceremony. They said their “I do”s, and they were hitched, the couple recalled.
But the marriage didn’t work out, and seven months later, they split.
The two wondered whether their marriage was even valid under Pennsylvania law after reading newspaper articles that unions performed by Internet-ordained ministers might not be upheld if taken to court.
Friday, they found out it wasn’t. York County Judge Maria Musti Cook declared their marriage never existed.
This case is the first of its kind in the state, according to David Cleaver, solicitor for the Pennsylvania State Association of Registers of Wills and Clerks of Orphans’ Court.
Under Pennsylvania law, those qualified to officiate a marriage are judges, mayors, or ministers, priests or rabbis of a “regularly established church or congregation.”
The friend who performed the ceremony, Adam Johnston, wasn’t a member of the Universal Life Church before receiving his ordination, and he testified he has not attended meetings at the church, the judge wrote.
He doesn’t have a congregation he meets with regularly or a place of worship, she wrote.
Based upon that, Cook found that Johnson did not meet the qualifications for those who may solemnize marriages.
Cleaver said he predicted years ago courts would not uphold such marriages.
Cleaver is advising county officials not to file marriage returns if officiants have been ordained through the Internet.
Brad Jacobs, register of wills and clerk of orphans court for York County, said his office would do so if they can prove that it was an Internet-ordained officiant. But there is no registry for clergy in Pennsylvania.
The state House also is considering legislation to exclude churches or congregations that offer ordinations by mail or through electronic means.
But G. Martin Freeman, Universal Life Church Monastery president, called the ruling “capricious” and “arbitrary.”
“It violates the First Amendment to the Constitution,” he said, referring to the separation of church and state.
Officials are accepting some ministers but not others, Freeman said. He hopes to challenge the ruling.
Heyer, 21, of Windsor Township, and Hollerbush, 24, of York, said they hope others will learn from their experience. And Heyer agrees with the judge’s ruling.
“It makes a mockery out of the whole marriage system.”
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
 Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
 Previous entry: Lawyers say Thomas Weeks will contest Juanita Bynum’s petition for divorce Next entry: Imams warned not to rush through prayers; Smelly sock also a no-no
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
