Related
Translate
Advertisements *
Elsewhere
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Guyana’s Jonestown suicide site gets plaque
- Scientology practices ‘putting people at risk’
- Recession: Muslim schools in UK under threat of closure
- Australian senator tells Parliament of widespread criminal conduct within the Church of Scientology
- When a child dies, faith is no defense
- World’s oldest ocean-going passenger ship, ministry ship Doulos, to stop sailing
- Israel Charges Extremist With Attempted Murder Of Messianic Family
- Scientology’s feet held to the fire in Australia: Struggle between a church and the state
- 1-year prison term for man who participated in cyber attack on Church of Scientology Web sites
- Australian police take up complaints about Scientology
Jehovah’s Witness suit reinstated
More articles on this topic: Jehovah's WitnessesShunned Jehovah’s Witness Lawrence Hughes can proceed with legal action on behalf of his daughter’s estate over allegations the church’s influence hastened her death.
In a written decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal yesterday said Hughes should be restored as administrator of his dead daughter’s estate.
And, the top court ruled, litigation over allegations church members misrepresented the benefits of blood transfusions to Bethany Hughes could proceed.
But the appeal judges noted the case will not put on trial the belief of Jehovah’s Witnesses that blood transfusions are wrong.
- Four Dangers of the Jehovah’s Witness Organization
“The pleadings will not require any examination of the ‘truth’ of the (church members) beliefs about blood transfusions,” the judges said.
A lower court judge ruled last year the allegations of misrepresentation was simply an attack on Jehovah’s Witnesses beliefs.
Justice Patricia Rowbotham said litigation couldn’t proceed on the basis a religious belief is wrong.
But the appeal court said Charter protected freedom of religion is “subject to those limitations that are justifiable in a free and democratic society.”
“It is not at all clear to what extent a religious adherent can convince another person to take actions for religious reasons that will cause him or her bodily harm or even death, even if the religious belief is sincerely held,” they said
The appeal judges said those issues could only be resolved in a full trial.
Bethany Hughes, 17, died Sept. 5, 2002, two months after court-imposed transfusions were stopped when doctors determined they were ineffective. She had refused to approve the treatments based on her religious beliefs.
Lawrence Hughes commenced his nearly $1-million wrongful death suit two years later after a court approved him as administrator of the estate. That decision was later struck, effectively ending his legal action, but the appeal court reinstated him.
“It might be that the Charter protected right of freedom of religion would protect actions of this sort if they are honestly held,” they said.
“It might be argued at trial that there is no reasonable limit that would be recognized in a free and democratic society that would prevent the religious adherent from giving such medical advice.”
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
 Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
 Previous entry: Judge: Man accused in church killings is mentally competent to stand trial in Baton Rouge Next entry: US in dialogue with Sikhs over ‘pat-down’ of turbans
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
