‘Amen’ crops up in Warren Jeffs hearing

The significance of saying “amen” at the end of a sermon is now a legal debate in the case of polygamous sect leader Warren S. Jeffs.

Fifth District Judge James L. Shumate asked attorneys to look at whether Jeffs’ use of the word after a 2002 sermon could be held as legally ratifying the speaker’s comments.

During an Aug. 20 hearing, state witness Richard Holm described a church talk given by an FLDS member who criticized government efforts to regulate the faith’s marriage practices. At the end of the talk, Jeffs and others in the audience said, “Amen,” Holm said.

“The amens were loud and ranged through the congregation,” he told the judge.

Shumate then asked the attorneys to research whether saying “amen” could be interpreted as affirming the speaker’s remarks.

According to Webster’s New World Dictionary, amen means “may it be so” and is “usually used after a prayer or to express approval.”

Whatever the word means, it is not relevant to Jeffs’ case, his attorneys argue in documents filed in court Tuesday.

Prosecutors have not yet weighed in on the amen debate.

Jeffs is charged with being an accomplice to rape for conducting a 2001 marriage between a 19-year-old man and a 14-year-old girl, who alleges she objected to the union.

What he said at the end of the sermon has no bearing on those charges, said Walter Bugden, one of Jeffs’ three attorneys, in the court filing.

“The crux of the complaint is that Jeffs allegedly encouraged nonconsensual sex,” the filing states. “Jeffs’ utterance of ‘amen’ to the anti-government statement bears no logical relationship to the crime charged.”

Amen is “at best” an ambiguous response to a speaker that could mean a number of things, Bugden argues.

Saying amen at a church service is “often more of a reflex or a courtesy rather than a conscious adoption of the speaker’s statements,” his filing said. At no point did the talk encourage nonconsensual sex among church members, it states.

The talk and Jeffs’ response to it should be barred from use during his trial, set to begin Sept. 7, because it is prejudicial and likely to confuse the jury about the issue at stake, Budgen said.

“By highlighting FLDS opposition to government policy, the evidence tends to paint FLDS members – including Jeffs – as unlawful,” the filing states. “The focus will become whether Jeffs is the type of person who would commit rape versus the proper focus: whether Jeffs actually committed rape” as an accomplice.

Read Another Article

Rabbi, synagogue sued over seduction scandal
Family files new defamation lawsuit against polygamy victim and anti-polygamy group

Related News Articles Topic(s): FLDS • Polygamy Subscribe to Religion News Blog updates Subscribe to Religion News Blog [What is this?] Get Religion News Blog's headline by Email [What is this?] Follow Religion News Blog at Twitter Find Related Information Use our custom search engines to find additional research resources on religions and cults: ApologeticsSearch.com: Search for apologetics articles, books, videos, and other research resources across 135 Christian apologetics websites and blogs. CounterCultSearch.com: Search for information about (religious) cults, cult-like organizations, and cults experts -- as well as paranormal-, New Age, and pseudoscientific claims -- across 260+ websites, blogs and forums dedicated to cult research, spiritual abuse, ex-cult counseling & support. Find Related Religion & Spirituality Books at Amazon.com FLDS Possibly related... or Most Popular Religion News Articles Kent Hovind: Evangelist arrested on federal charges Beast’s real mark devalued to ’616′ Muslim Woman Gives Sex Advice on Arab TV Michael Jackson Confirms Conversion to Islam Kent Hovind, ‘Dr. Dino,’ guilty on all counts The fall and rise of Carlton Pearson Search False prophet Harold Camping sets another date for rapture: May 21, 2011 Watch the film Theo van Gogh was murdered for Kent Hovind — Dr. Dino — sentenced to 10 years in prison

Search Religion News Blog