Related
Translate
Previous entry: Maha Devi squatters have until next weds to leave Niue
Next entry: Mosque leader accused of immigration fraud
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Guyana’s Jonestown suicide site gets plaque
- Gaddafi preaches Islam to Rome beauties
- Scientology practices ‘putting people at risk’
- Recession: Muslim schools in UK under threat of closure
- Australian senator tells Parliament of widespread criminal conduct within the Church of Scientology
- When a child dies, faith is no defense
- Techie Holy water and geeky bishops
- Muslim terrorists smuggle fatwas promoting Jihad out of secure UK prisons
- Israel Charges Extremist With Attempted Murder Of Messianic Family
- Scientology’s feet held to the fire in Australia: Struggle between a church and the state
Former Exclusive Brethren man in court on sex charges
More articles on this topic: Exclusive BrethrenAn elderly former member of the Exclusive Brethren Church has appeared in Nelson District Court on a series of historic sex charges, some as old as 56 years.
The 72-year-old man was in court this morning, charged with six charges of indecent assault and one of inducing a girl to perform an indecent act on him.
The seven representative charges relate to four women, all former Exclusive Brethren members, and date from between 1951 and 1985. At the time of the offending two of the women were girls, aged between five and 10 years of age.
The man’s lawyer, Hamish Riddoch, asked for interim name suppression, saying disaffected members of the church had generated publicity about the case.
Because of the publicity there was concern about prejudice and whether the man could get a fair trial.
But Judge Tony Zohrab denied the request, saying it was known there was a former church member facing such charges and by not allowing the publication of his name “the finger may well be pointed at other members of the Exclusive Brethren Church”.
He said police also opposed name suppression, believing publication of his name could assist their inquiries into the matter.
But he granted an interim order when Mr Riddoch said he would appeal the decision. Mr Riddoch also indicated he would make an application for a stay on the charges following a depositions hearing.
The man was remanded without plea to reappear in court on August 14 and directed not to have any contact with the complainants and to surrender his passport.
Speaking outside the court, Mr Riddoch said a stay could result in a discharge or the court directing no indictments be laid on the basis that a trial would be prejudiced and the man would not get a fair trial.
As an example, he said the historic nature of the charges meant some witnesses who may have been able to give evidence in defence of the defendant could now be dead.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: Maha Devi squatters have until next weds to leave Niue Next entry: Mosque leader accused of immigration fraud
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
