Previous entry: Paranormal man claims he can prove afterlife exists
Next entry: Germans Nix Cruise Movie Over Scientology
Related
Advertisements *
Advertise Here *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Evangelist Ted Haggard returns to the pulpit in Illinois
- Peoples Temple: pain of cult massacre lives on
- Jury awards $2.5 million to teen beaten by Klan members
- Opinion writer spouts misinformation about the term ‘cult’
- Cult or Church: Woman questions Order of Christ-Sophia
- Religious cult member convicted but viewed as victim of cult leader
- Michael Jackson converts to Islam
- Arkansas takes 21 children from Tony Alamo Christian Ministries compound into protective custody
- Cult member in toddler starvation case ordered released pending trial
- Lawyers for FLDS leader Warren Jeffs to question anti-polygamy activist Flora Jessop
Supreme Court Rules Against Bong Hits 4 Jesus Student
More articles on this topic: Free SpeechThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that students can face limits on their rights to free speech.
Schools can rein in students’ speech if it can be interpreted as promoting illegal drug use, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the court’s opinion.
The case stemmed from an incident in January 2002 in which a crowd of students, townspeople and teachers gathered on a public street in Alaska across from a high school to watch the Olympic torch relay pass in front of them as part of a parade in support of the upcoming Winter Olympic Games.
Student Joseph Frederick wanted to make a statement about his First Amendment rights in front of the television crews covering the event. As the crowd thickened, he unfurled a banner with the message “Bong Hits 4 Jesus.”
Frederick had been bothered in his senior year by the lack of attention to the issue of freedom of speech in the United States, and at his school in particular.
In briefs, Frederick argued that he was only trying to assert his rights and that the message was not an attempt to “spread any idea.”
His school principal, Deborah Morse, was not amused. She marched across the street and seized the banner and later suspended Frederick, who had had previous disciplinary problems at school. She accused Frederick of violating the school’s policy against displaying offensive material and advocating the use of illegal drugs.
Frederick, however, turned around and sued not only Morse but also his school board, saying that the school had violated his First Amendment rights. He argued that he was not on school property.
Lawyers for Morse had argued that she was responsible for “maintaining order and proper decorum” at a gathering outside of the school. In briefs her lawyers argued, “She responsibly took the appropriate action to ensure that the Olympic torch relay event was not further disrupted by Frederick’s pro-drug banner.”
In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that students could wear black armbands to protest Vietnam. It established the right to speak freely in schools. Since that decision a lot has changed. Other cases have reached courts that limited students’ free speech.
Schools have had to find ways to control gangs, stop school shootings, deal with perceived hostility toward religion in public schools and cope with a rise of drugs and alcohol on campus.
What You Can Do From Here
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
