Related
Advertisements *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
![]() |
![]() Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Hate incidents in U.S. surge
- Netherlands will extend burqa ban to universities
- California county OKs limits on picketing in response to anti-Scientology protests
- Mercy Ministries exorcism books leaked
- AUM Shinrikyo bankruptcy procedures to end, victims get 40% of compensation
- RNB Roundup: Atheism ads get tax support; Holland bans Magic Mushrooms; Fritzl turns to Buddhism; More…
- 8 new charges filed against jailed Tony Alamo
- Tony Alamo takes the stand at custody hearing
- UK pastor who claimed to produce ‘miracle babies’ another step closer to extradition
- Child of Jehovah’s Witnesses can be given blood, judge says
UK headteachers can ban the veil in class
Muslim pupils can be banned from wearing the veil by headteachers, Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer has announced.
He said heads would be perfectly justified in refusing unreasonable demands from Muslim pupils to wear Islamic dress in schools.
His decision comes after a Luton school banned Muslim girl Shabina Begum from wearing a jilbab - a long loose gown - to class.
The Law Lords last year ruled that the school had been justified in its decision.
Lord Falconer told the National Association of Headteachers’ annual conference in Bournemouth that human rights were not at odds with common sense.
Human rights are based on freedom, equality, tolerance and respect, and are not some European initiative but truly British in nature, he said.
He also argued that headteachers who act properly in response to issues such as those raised in the Begum case should not fear a legal challenge under the Human Rights Act.
However, he added that it was important for schools to weigh up the needs and sensitivities of the local community when drafting policies on issues such as school uniforms.
A year ago the Law Lords backed the decision by Denbigh High School in Luton, Bedfordshire, to ban Ms Begum from wearing the jilbab.
She had won an earlier ruling at the Court of Appeal that her human rights had been violated when she was told by a teacher to go home and change into a uniform approved by the school.
Lord Bingham said at the time that the school was fully justified in acting as it did.
“It had taken immense pains to devise a uniform policy which respected Muslim beliefs but did so in an inclusive, unthreatening and uncompetitive way,” he said.
Ms Begum had taken the school’s headteacher and governors to court for denying her the “right to education and to manifest her religious beliefs” under the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights.
She had worn the shalwar kameez (trousers and tunic) and headscarf from the time she started at the school at the age of 12 until September 2002, when she and her brother, Shuweb Rahman, said the rules of her religion required her to wear the head-to-toe jilbab.
What You Can Do From Here
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:



