<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polygamy&#8230; Utah&#8217;s Open Little Secret</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.religionnewsblog.com/16068/polygamy-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.religionnewsblog.com/16068/polygamy-2</link>
	<description>Religion news about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:22:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bloggernacle Times &#187; Utah&#8217;s Open Little Secret</title>
		<link>http://www.religionnewsblog.com/16068/polygamy-2/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggernacle Times &#187; Utah&#8217;s Open Little Secret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionnewsblog.com/16068/polygamy-2#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] Via RNB, a Chicago Tribune article entitled &#8220;Polygamy (Utah&#8217;s open little secret)&#8221; (the original article is here).  The article includes many interesting quotes from individuals involved with polygamy as present or former practitioners.  The article comes off as being mildly critical of the practice, but at the same time it tries to be fairly neutral as to the various polygamous sects it lists and discusses.  And it sounds surprisingly sympathetic to the polygamous wives interviewed and quoted. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via RNB, a Chicago Tribune article entitled &#8220;Polygamy (Utah&#8217;s open little secret)&#8221; (the original article is here).  The article includes many interesting quotes from individuals involved with polygamy as present or former practitioners.  The article comes off as being mildly critical of the practice, but at the same time it tries to be fairly neutral as to the various polygamous sects it lists and discusses.  And it sounds surprisingly sympathetic to the polygamous wives interviewed and quoted. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
