Skip to main content.
Religion News Blog is a non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news
ReligionNewsBlog

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Navigation:
Home | Site Menu | About RNB | RNB Store | Cult FAQ | Cult Experts | Apologetics Index | Cult Information Search Engine
A Random Image


 Search



 Share & Follow Religion News Blog


 Remember These Stories?


 Amazon

More articles about: Scientology:

Scientologist Couple Fights Newborn Blood Test Law

AP, via SFGate.com, USA
June 8, 2006
Kevin O'Hanlon
www.sfgate.com

ReligionNewsBlog.com • Tuesday June 13, 2006

Lincoln, Neb. (AP) — A Saunders County couple has asked a federal judge to throw out Nebraska’s one-of-a-kind newborn blood screening law before the case goes to trial.

Ray and Louise Spiering filed a lawsuit challenging the law in 2004, arguing that the mandatory blood test would violate a tenet of their religion beliefs as members of the Church of Scientology.

This week, they asked U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf of Lincoln to declare the law unconstitutional before a trial is held.

Lawyers for the state have until July 7 to respond to the request.

The blood screening has been standard practice in Nebraska since 1967. State health officials say the test, which consists of pricking an infant’s heel to draw five drops of blood, is necessary to prevent several metabolic diseases that can cause severe mental retardation or death if left undetected.

Officials say those diseases put a strain on families and on taxpayers who often must pay for long-term care of the disabled.

Scientologists believe, however, that babies are best served with seven days of silence after birth.

“The Spierings believe that subjecting a child to the pain and trauma of a blood draw within seven days of birth could cause the child to later experience extreme physical and mental trauma which would affect the child’s physical and mental health,” one of their lawyers, Gene Summerlin, said in court documents.

All 50 states have newborn screening statutes.

Nebraska, Montana, Michigan and South Dakota are the only states that do not allow an exemption for parents who oppose the test for reasons such as religious beliefs.

But Nebraska is the only state that allows a court to force parents to comply with the law.

In 2004, Kopf granted the Spierings’ request for a temporary order restraining the state from taking their newborn’s blood within 48 hours of birth.

Kopf instructed the couple to have the test as soon as possible after the seventh day.

In asking for the law to be thrown out, the Spierings argue that Nebraska’s law allows other exceptions for the tests to be delayed.

They cite a 1984 ruling by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case in which a woman challenged Nebraska’s requirement driver’s licenses contain a photograph of the licensee.

She refused to have her photograph taken based on her religious convictions.

She argued that the state did not require photographs on learner’s permits, temporary driver’s licenses, farm permits or school permits.

The 8th Circuit said that because the state already allows numerous exemptions to the photograph requirement, Nebraska’ argument that denying her an exemption serves a compelling state interest is “without substantial merit.”

In 2003, the Nebraska Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the newborn blood screening law by Josue and Mary Anaya of Omaha.

The Anayas, who are fundamental Christians, argued that compelling the tests violated their religious beliefs. They cited the Bible, saying “the life of the flesh is in the blood” in refusing to have the baby tested. The Anayas said they believed that taking a baby’s blood could shorten its life.

The high court agreed with Douglas County District Judge Patricia Lamberty, who noted that the U.S. Constitution gives parents the authority to make decisions concerning the care, custody and control of their children without unwarranted state intrusion.

However, she said, states can intervene if they have a compelling governmental interest, such as preventing diseases.

She said the law “does not unlawfully burden the Anayas’ right to freely exercise their religion, nor does it unlawfully burden their parental rights.”

The Spierings are also being represented by the ACLU.

Bookmark share or email this Religion News Blog page Bookmark, Share, or Email This Page

 

Read another article Read Another Article

Tags and keywords for this Apologetics Index entry Related News Articles

arrow Topic(s): Scientology
arrow

RSS Feed Subscribe to Religion News Blog updates

Religion News Find Related Information

Use our custom search engines to find additional research resources on religions and cults:
arrow ApologeticsSearch.com: Search for apologetics articles, books, videos, and other research resources across 135 Christian apologetics websites and blogs.
arrow CounterCultSearch.com: Search for information about (religious) cults, cult-like organizations, and cults experts -- as well as paranormal-, New Age, and pseudoscientific claims -- across 260+ websites, blogs and forums dedicated to cult research, spiritual abuse, ex-cult counseling & support.

Religion News Find Related Religion & Spirituality Books at Amazon.com

Religion News Possibly related... or Most Popular Religion News Articles

Religion News Search Search Religion News Blog