Related
Advertisements *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
![]() |
![]() Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- RNB Roundup: Atheism ads get tax support; Holland bans Magic Mushrooms; Fritzl turns to Buddhism; More…
- UK pastor who claimed to produce ‘miracle babies’ another step closer to extradition
- Europe court says no to turban on Sikh’s driving licence
- Two teens file lawsuit against evangelist Tony Alamo over beatings
- Decision expected this week on whether parents will face trial in faith healing death
- Church tries Goth Liturgy
- Japan: Security agency calls for extension of surveillance of Aum cult
- Ganas commune co-founder sues current and former members
- Mormon church publishes journal of founder Joseph Smith
- Judge allows reckless homocide charges in faith healing death of Madeline Neumann
Gospel of Judas: Document Is Genuine, but Is Its Story True?
In 1959, when the Gospel of Thomas was first published in English, many Christians were shocked to learn that any gospels existed other than Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
It was also the first time that most Christians had ever heard about the Gnostics — Christian communities in the second through fourth centuries whose scriptures and spiritual beliefs barely resemble what is now thought of as traditional Christianity.
But the Gospel of Judas, another piece of Gnostic scripture, has been released in a very different era. It is a time when many Christians have been bombarded by competing claims about their faith and its history, and some are grappling with how to absorb it all.
Gnosticism has become practically a household word, largely thanks to the novel “The Da Vinci Code,” as well as to scholars of early Christianity like Elaine Pagels, who write for a popular audience.
Many more Gnostic Gospels have been translated and distributed — Mary Magdalene, Philip, Thomas and even “The Gospel of Truth.” Some churches are holding study groups to pick over books on the “historical Jesus.”
The Gospel of Judas is only the latest crumbling parchment to surface in the sands of Egypt like an ancient time capsule. Even before its formal introduction at a National Geographic Society news conference yesterday, scholars have been part of a debate that will soon be echoing in churches, on the Web and in Christian publishing.
The real debate is whether the text says anything historically legitimate about Jesus and Judas.
Some of the scholars on National Geographic’s advisory committee said the text should prompt a reassessment of Judas. In it, Jesus speaks privately to Judas, telling him he will share with Judas alone “the mysteries of the kingdom.” Jesus asks Judas to turn him over to the Roman authorities so that his body can be sacrificed.
Craig Evans, a professor of the New Testament at Acadia Divinity College in Wolfville, Nova Scotia, and a scholar on the National Geographic panel, conjectured that some of the dialogue between Jesus and Judas may have been spoken in private, and so did not make its way into the New Testament Gospels, which are more likely to treat Jesus’ public statements.
“It is possible that the Gospel of Judas preserves an old memory that Jesus had actually instructed Judas in private, and the other disciples did not know about it,” Dr. Evans said.
Ms. Pagels, a religion professor at Princeton, said the discoveries of the Gospel of Judas and other Gnostic texts were “exploding the myth of a monolithic Christianity.”
The reaction of other scholars is that the Gospel of Judas is interesting but no challenge to the New Testament.
“The manuscript tells us nothing about the historical Jesus or the historical Judas,” said Ben Witherington III, professor of New Testament interpretation at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Ky. “It tells us a lot about a group that were labeled heretics in their own day.”
Scholars on all sides agree that the text was probably produced by a scribe in a Gnostic community of Cainites — early Christians who regarded the traditional villains of the Bible, including Cain and Judas, as heroes.
“There is no evidence that any of these documents ever represented mainstream Christianity,” Professor Witherington said. “The Cainites were always on the fringes of their own movement.”
He said that unlike the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, which were written in Christianity’s first century, Gnostic works were produced in the second century and afterward. To say that the Gospel of Judas reveals anything factual about Judas, Dr. Witherington said, “is like saying a document written 150 years after George Washington died tells us the inside truth about George Washington.”
Another member of the National Geographic panel of scholars, the Rev. Donald Senior, said the Gnostic gospels could undermine Christianity only if many Christians were to adopt the kind of conspiracy thinking that undergirds “The Da Vinci Code”: that an “orthodox elite” of early church authorities suppressed the free-thinking, spiritual Gnostics “for the sake of uniformity and conformity.”
Father Senior, president of the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago and a member of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, which advises the pope, said the Vatican was unlikely to regard the Gospel of Judas as a threat. He said that the Roman Catholic Church’s likely response would be to “affirm the canonical texts” in the New Testament, rather than seeking to refute each new discovery.
“If the Gospel of Judas suddenly became something that hundreds of thousands of Christians were claiming as their revelation and scripture, perhaps the church would come out with some kind of statement,” Father Senior said in an interview. “But mostly I think it’s just not even on the radar screen.”
He added, “I’m just glad it wasn’t found in a bank vault in the Vatican.”
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Find Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:



