Related
Advertisements *
Advertise Here *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Cult leader Wayne Bent ends ‘religious fast’
- John Travolta’s 16-year-old son dies
- Forensic interview with girl in Tony Alamo case leaked to website
- Priest’s 2006 conviction in nun’s murder stands
- 9 Muslims Are Pulled From Plane and Denied Re-entry; Airline Apologizes Next Day
- Neo-Nazi Violence: German Mayor in Hiding after Far-Right Threat
- Jett Travolta’s death shines spotlights on cult’s quackery
- Tom Cruise gets more mileage out of claim that Scientology cured his dyslexia
- Judge: smuggled monkey meat needed for religious reasons? Still need a permit
- Facts don’t fit claims of FLDS welfare fraud
Final chapter for The Da Vinci Code case to unfold in court
More articles on this topic: Da Vinci CodeLONDON, United Kingdom (AP) — A three-week long trial that has swung from the religious mysteries in “The Da Vinci Code” to the more humdrum world of copyright law approaches its climax in a British court Monday.
Lawyers for Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, authors who claim millionaire novelist Dan Brown “appropriated the architecture” of their 1982 nonfiction book “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,” are to begin their closing arguments in High Court.
Baigent and Leigh are suing Random House, publishers of “The Da Vinci Code,” for copyright infringement.
Both “The Da Vinci Code” and “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” explore theories — dismissed by theologians — that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, the couple had a child and that the bloodline survives.
On Friday, lawyers for Random House argued that the case of Baigent and Leigh was in tatters. Lawyer John Baldwin said Brown’s work gathered a number of incidents and put them together in a unique way, which was why he had a hit novel.
Brown has acknowledged that he and his wife, Blythe Brown, read “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” while researching “The Da Vinci Code,” but said they also used 38 other books and hundreds of documents, and that the British authors’ book was not crucial to their work.
“The ideas are of too general a nature to be capable of copyright protection,” Baldwin argued. “The claimants’ claim relates to ideas at a high level of generality, which copyright does not protect.”
Brown spent three days on the witness stand defending his book and his research methods. “The Da Vinci Code” follows fictional professor Robert Langdon as he investigates the murder of an elderly member of an ancient society that guards dark secrets about the story of Jesus and the quest for the Holy Grail.
If Baigent and Leigh succeed in securing an injunction to bar the use of their material, they could hold up the scheduled May 19 film release of “The Da Vinci Code,” starring Tom Hanks and Audrey Tautou. Sony Pictures says it plans to release the film as scheduled.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
 Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
 Previous entry: 24 House Church Leaders Missing After Police Raid in Henan Province, China Next entry: Evangelicals seeing the error of replacement theology
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
