Related
Advertisements *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
![]() |
![]() Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Evangelist Ted Haggard returns to the pulpit in Illinois
- Peoples Temple: pain of cult massacre lives on
- Jury awards $2.5 million to teen beaten by Klan members
- Opinion writer spouts misinformation about the term ‘cult’
- Religious cult member convicted but viewed as victim of cult leader
- Cult or Church: Woman questions Order of Christ-Sophia
- Cult member in toddler starvation case ordered released pending trial
- Arkansas takes 21 children from Tony Alamo Christian Ministries compound into protective custody
- French appeals court restores marriage between two Muslims in virginity case
- Lawyers for FLDS leader Warren Jeffs to question anti-polygamy activist Flora Jessop
Da Vinci Code author in copyright dispute
Conspiracy theories involving the Catholic Church and the Holy Grail are about to be investigated at the High Court.
One of the world’s highest-paid authors, Dan Brown, is being challenged by two men who claim he stole their ideas for his blockbuster, The Da Vinci Code.
Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh are suing their own publishers, Random House, claiming the international successful novel lifts from their 1982 book, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, itself a best seller.
This non-fiction work deals with theories that Jesus and Mary Magdalene married, had a child, and the blood line continues to this day - with the Catholic Church trying suppress the discovery.
It is similar to the theme explored in the Dan Brown novel which won best book at last year’s British Book Awards and has sold over 30 million copies worldwide, earning the author ?45 million in one year.
If the two writers are successful and opt to take injunctions stopping use of their material, it could threaten the British release of the film adaptation of the novel, starring Tom Hanks and Sir Ian McKellen, which is scheduled to open on May 19.
The case, expected to last up to two weeks if there is no settlement in the meantime, is also likely to clarify existing copyright laws over the extent to which an author can use other people’s research.
Dan Brown acknowledges the theories of The Holy Blood in his novel and names the villain in his story Sir Leigh Teabing, which, it has been suggested, was a deliberate part anagram of the surnames of the authors of the earlier work.
The two books - which deal with parallel versions of the fate of Jesus Christ - have now ended up in the Chancery Division of the High Court for a battle over the huge financial returns both have generated by their success.
Like this story?
Today's Most Popular Articles |
|
Share this
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
Article and Site Tools
» PermaLink to: Da Vinci Code author in copyright dispute Need a shorter link? You can remove everything after the final / » More news articles + news archive on Da Vinci Code » More religion and cult news Subscribe (RSS / Email) [What is RSS?] » RSS News Feed - All Topics: Religion News Blog RSS Feed » RSS News Feed - Single Topic: Da Vinci Code » Headlines by Email: Daily Religion News Blog Headlines |
More Article Tools
Bookmark / Tag: Del.icio.us Bookmark / Tag: Furl Save this article Email this article Print this article [Temporarily out of order] More Information Books about Da Vinci Code Relevant books (and other goodies) |



