Related
Translate
Previous entry: Jung Myung Seok: How to Spot a Woolly Wolf
Next entry: Christians offered marital thrills
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Guyana’s Jonestown suicide site gets plaque
- Gaddafi preaches Islam to Rome beauties
- Scientology practices ‘putting people at risk’
- Recession: Muslim schools in UK under threat of closure
- Australian senator tells Parliament of widespread criminal conduct within the Church of Scientology
- When a child dies, faith is no defense
- Muslim terrorists smuggle fatwas promoting Jihad out of secure UK prisons
- Techie Holy water and geeky bishops
- Israel Charges Extremist With Attempted Murder Of Messianic Family
- Scientology’s feet held to the fire in Australia: Struggle between a church and the state
Ministers lose religious bill bid
More articles on this topic: Racial and Religious Hatred BillThe government has suffered two shock defeats over attempts to overturn Lords changes to the controversial Racial and Religious Hatred Bill.
In a blow to Tony Blair’s authority, MPs voted by 288 votes to 278 to back a key Lords amendment to the bill, which targets incitement to religious hatred.
The prime minister voted in the first division but not in the second, which was lost by one vote.
Home Secretary Charles Clarke told MPs the bill would now become law.
Mr Clarke claimed what had happened had been “a purely political act” by Tories, Lib Dems and members of his own side to defeat the government, rather than a genuine consideration of the issues in the bill.
The bill was aimed at extending the concept of the UK’s race hate laws to cover belief but critics said ministers’ proposals would have made it too wide-reaching.
‘Victory for Parliament’
The government has only suffered one defeat since 1997 before Tuesday night’s vote and that was on the Terrorism Bill in November.
Shadow attorney general Dominic Grieve said the defeats were “a victory for Parliament”.
He branded the bill a “foolish manifesto commitment” introduced to “appease” some minority groups, and which had “threatened freedom of speech”.
Mr Grieve said in multicultural Britain people had to accept that freedom of speech may mean people could be offensive to them, as well as vice versa.
He said: “This (bill) was completely contrary to our national tradition of free speech.”
Evan Harris, the Liberal Democrats human rights spokesman, said: “The government just failed to understand that they can’t take liberties with freedom of expression.
“This has showed tonight that we will stand up for freedom of expression.”
Joke restrictions fear
Labour rebel Bob Marshall-Andrews said: “It was an awful misjudgement to believe you could get a bill like this through in the teeth of opposition from so many of your backbenchers.”
Labour’s John McDonnell, chair of the Socialist Campaign Group of MPs, said the vote showed that “democracy has broken out”.
Shami Chakrabarti, of Liberty, said her organisation “takes great heart as Parliament stands up for our rights and freedoms once more”.
Earlier in the Commons, Home Office Minister Paul Goggins told MPs that moves to combat religious hatred would not damage freedom of speech and only those who intending to “stir up hatred” would be caught by the government’s plans.
But objectors, including comedian Rowan Atkinson, feared the proposals would limit artistic freedom and might have stopped comedians making jokes about religion.
Safeguards
The votes came after hundreds protested against the bill outside Parliament on Tuesday.
In the first vote, 27 Labour backbenchers rebelled and more than 40 others did not vote. At least 15 of these were Scottish MPs believed to have been campaigning for next week’s Dunfermline and Fife West by-election.
Analysis of the division list showed Mr Blair was recorded as voting with the government line in this division.
In the second vote, MPs voted by 283 votes to 282, majority one, to back the Lords – but Mr Blair was not recorded as having voted.
The Commons confrontation followed a series of defeats inflicted on the bill by peers in a bid to safeguard freedom of speech.
The peers said only “threatening words” should be banned by the bill, not those which are only abusive or insulting.
They also called for the offence to be intentional and specified that proselytising, discussion, criticism, insult, abuse and ridicule of religion, belief or religious practice would not be an offence.
Ministers had urged MPs to reject the Lords’ amendments and back instead a government compromise instead.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: Jung Myung Seok: How to Spot a Woolly Wolf Next entry: Christians offered marital thrills
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
