Related
Translate
Previous entry: Sex charges cast pall on Bishop Paulk
Next entry: Palestinian gunmen take over EU office in protest against cartoons
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Scientologists try to block ‘intolerant’ German feature film
- Aum Shinrikyo victim count rises
- Iranian Pastor Tortured, Threatened for ‘Converting Muslims’
- Senator to speak at Brisbane anti-cult conference
- Seven Muslims held over plot to murder cartoonist
- Muslim gangs imposing sharia law in British prisons
- Feds: ‘JihadJane’ Female American convert to Islam led death plot
- After murder plot: Swedish papers publish cartoon depicting Muhammad as a dog
- Scientology putting lives at risk, says mental health expert Pat McGorry
- Senator Xenophon vows to pursue ‘cults’
Britons unconvinced on evolution
More articles on this topic: Science and ReligionJust under half of Britons accept the theory of evolution as the best description for the development of life, according to an opinion poll.
Furthermore, more than 40% of those questioned believe that creationism or intelligent design (ID) should be taught in school science lessons.
The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI for the BBC’s Horizon series.
Its latest programme, A War on Science, looks into the attempt to introduce ID into science classes in the US.
Over 2,000 participants took part in the survey, and were asked what best described their view of the origin and development of life:
- 22% chose creationism
- 17% opted for intelligent design
- 48% selected evolution theory
- and the rest did not know.
Intelligent design is the concept that certain features of living things are so complex that their existence is better explained by an “intelligent process” than natural selection.
Education questioned
Andrew Cohen, editor of Horizon, commented: “I think that this poll represents our first introduction to the British public’s views on this issue.
“Most people would have expected the public to go for evolution theory, but it seems there are lots of people who appear to believe in an alternative theory for life’s origins.”
When given a choice of three descriptions for the development of life on Earth, people were asked which one or ones they would like to see taught in science lessons in British schools:
- 44% said creationism should be included
- 41% intelligent design
- 69% wanted evolution as part of the science curriculum.
Participants over 55 were less likely to choose evolution over other groups.
“This really says something about the role of science education in this country and begs us to question how we are teaching evolutionary theory,” Andrew Cohen added.
The findings prompted surprise from the scientific community. Lord Martin Rees, President of the Royal Society, said: “It is surprising that many should still be sceptical of Darwinian evolution. Darwin proposed his theory nearly 150 years ago, and it is now supported by an immense weight of evidence.
“We are, however, fortunate compared to the US in that no major segment of UK religious or cultural life opposes the inclusion of evolution in the school science curriculum.”
In the US, a recent high profile court case ruled that the intelligent design movement is motivated by a desire to introduce God into the classroom.
This came after parents in Pennsylvania took a school board to court for demanding that biology classes should not teach evolution as fact.
Horizon: A War on Science was broadcast on BBC Two at 2100GMT on Thursday, 26 January 2006
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: Sex charges cast pall on Bishop Paulk Next entry: Palestinian gunmen take over EU office in protest against cartoons
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
