Related
Translate
Previous entry: Woman defies law banning the burqa
Next entry: Man Gets 39 Years for Firebombing Temple
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Guyana’s Jonestown suicide site gets plaque
- Scientology practices ‘putting people at risk’
- Recession: Muslim schools in UK under threat of closure
- Australian senator tells Parliament of widespread criminal conduct within the Church of Scientology
- World’s oldest ocean-going passenger ship, ministry ship Doulos, to stop sailing
- When a child dies, faith is no defense
- Israel Charges Extremist With Attempted Murder Of Messianic Family
- Scientology’s feet held to the fire in Australia: Struggle between a church and the state
- 1-year prison term for man who participated in cyber attack on Church of Scientology Web sites
- Australian police take up complaints about Scientology
Religious group joins environmentalist in suing US over ‘hapless’ toad
More articles on this topic: USAA US environmental group and a Christian prayer network have joined forces to sue the Bush administration over the fate of an endangered toad.
It is the same “hapless” amphibian at the centre of a legal opinion by US Supreme Court nominee John Roberts.
The Centre for Biological Diversity and Christians Caring for Creation claim in their federal lawsuit that the US Fish and Wildlife Service has failed to protect the California habitat of the endangered arroyo toad.
Judge Roberts issued an opinion in a separate case involving the arroyo toad in 2003, while sitting as a judge in the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, an opinion that has been criticised by liberal groups as evidence of his “radical” views on states rights and environmental laws.
In that case an appeals court found the Federal Government could use the Endangered Species Act to stop a developer from building on land that had been designated part of the arroyo toad’s habitat.
Judge Roberts disagreed, questioning whether “a hapless toad that, for reasons of its own, lives its entire life in California”, could be subject to federal laws.
He suggested it should be up to California legislators to protect the toad.
The lawsuit, filed last week in Riverside, California, claims that in cutting the number of acres (hectares) set aside for the toad from 478,000 to 12,000 in April, the Fish and Wildlife Service has threatened to drive the toad into extinction.
A spokeswoman for the US Department of the Interior, which oversees the Fish and Wildlife Service, could not be reached for comment.
“It’s an unfortunate commentary on the willingness of this administration to undermine the Endangered Species Act,” David Hogan, a spokesman for the Center for Biological Diversity, said.
“Despite its small size this toad needs a lot of land to complete its life cycle.”
Mr Hogan said the centre has been working since 1999 to save the arroyo toad and called it a coincidence that the amphibian has also surfaced in the debate over Judge Roberts’ nomination.
But he said the group was happy to take advantage of that to gain publicity for their issue.
They have named their website devoted to the issue Hapless Toad (www.haplesstoad.com) – a reference to an aside by the justice in his dissenting opinion on the 2003 case.
The liberal People From the American Way, which has opposed Judge Roberts’ nomination, has said his “radical” view on the toad case could extend far beyond environmental laws to areas of federal authority including Medicare and Social Security.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: Woman defies law banning the burqa Next entry: Man Gets 39 Years for Firebombing Temple
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
