Religion News Blog is a non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Navigation:

Search

More articles about: Jehovah's Witnesses:

Court upholds dismissal of civil case against church

Associated Press, via the Portsmouth Herald, USA
July 16, 2005
www.seacoastonline.com

ReligionNewsBlog.com • Sunday July 17, 2005

CONCORD, N.H. – The state Supreme Court has ruled that a Wilton church cannot be sued for failing to protect two young sisters from sexual abuse.

The two sisters, now 26 and 23, sued the Jehovah’s Witnesses congregation in Wilton and the national Watchtower Bible and Tract Society in 2003, charging local church elders did not notify civil authorities about the abuse Paul Berry had inflicted on them as children. But the state’s highest court on Friday sided with a lower court in dismissing their suit.

In Context

Church faces abuse complaints

Was church legally bound to report child abuse?

Lawsuit puts religious rights, state law at odds

Judge: Elders not required to report abuse

Hearing slated for suit against church

Judge: Sisters may pursue church case

Research resources on Jehovah’s Witnesses

Berry is serving 56 to 112 years in prison for sexually abusing his stepdaughter. Charges that he also abused his biological daughter were dropped after his conviction in the first case in 2000.

During his trial, the sisters’ mother testified that she had confided numerous times to church elders that Berry was physically and emotionally abusing the girls but was told to remain quiet, pray more and try to be a better spouse.

The court ruled that though church elders had a moral obligation to intervene, they had no legal duty to do so.

“Unfortunately the church has been told it is not responsible,” said attorney Marci Hamilton, who represented the sisters.

The court echoed the lower court’s ruling that even if someone violates the state law requiring an individual _ regardless of profession or clerical duty_ to report suspected child abuse, the violation does not allow a civil remedy.

The sisters also claimed they had a special relationship with the Wilton congregation and the Watchtower body, and thus the church had a duty to protect them. But the court majority ruled that no such relationship existed because church attendance is not compulsory, the sisters were not under the custody of the church, and the abuse did not occur on church property.

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Theologically, Jehovah’s Witnesses are a cult of Christianity. The oppressive organization does not represent historical, Biblical Christianity in any way.

Sociologically, it is a destructive cult whose false teachings frequently result in spiritual and psychological abuse, as well as needless deaths.

In order to be able to support its unbiblical doctrines, the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization has created it’s own version of the Bible. The so-called “New World Translation” is rejected by all Christian denominations.

Research resources on Jehovah’s Witnesses

“Although their positions in the Wilton Congregation invested them with a strong moral obligation to do all reasonably possible to stop the abuse, it would be inappropriate to transform a moral obligation into a common law duty,” Chief Justice John Broderick wrote for the majority.

The majority, though, placed fault on Poisson. “She had her own independent and overarching duty to protect her children from abuse perpetrated by her husband and had a common law obligation to intervene regardless of any advice she received,” Broderick wrote.