Related
Translate
Previous entry: High court agrees to review hallucinogenic tea case
Next entry: Smarts distance themselves from book
Advertisements *
Elsewhere
Get RNB via RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Get RNB via Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Follow: Twitter
Most Popular
This Week:
- Guyana’s Jonestown suicide site gets plaque
- Gaddafi preaches Islam to Rome beauties
- Scientology practices ‘putting people at risk’
- Recession: Muslim schools in UK under threat of closure
- Australian senator tells Parliament of widespread criminal conduct within the Church of Scientology
- When a child dies, faith is no defense
- Muslim terrorists smuggle fatwas promoting Jihad out of secure UK prisons
- Techie Holy water and geeky bishops
- Israel Charges Extremist With Attempted Murder Of Messianic Family
- 1-year prison term for man who participated in cyber attack on Church of Scientology Web sites
Elizabeth Smart’s uncle criticizes police probe
More articles on this topic: Elizabeth SmartNew book mentions incidents that allegedly impeded investigation into her disappearance
Elizabeth Smart’s uncle has faulted the police investigation into her disappearance in a new book, claiming the teen would still be a kidnap victim if the family had not gotten involved.
“I don’t think she would be back,” Tom Smart said. “There’s five or six things that had to happen, and all those things, thank God, happened, including help from the community, which raised awareness to find Elizabeth.”
The book, “In Plain Sight: The Startling Truth Behind the Elizabeth Smart Investigation,” went on sale Monday.
Elizabeth was allegedly kidnapped from her home in June 2002 and found nine months later in the Salt Lake suburb of Sandy, walking down a street with Brian David Mitchell and Wanda Barzee. Mitchell is accused of taking Smart into the foothills near her home to keep her as his second wife.
While grateful for the “tireless efforts” of law enforcement, Tom Smart and co-author Lee Benson claim that in August 2002, two months after Elizabeth disappeared, police were alerted by a caller who thought he had spotted Elizabeth at a library.
An officer allegedly checked out a homeless man wearing robes and his two female companions, one a young girl behind a veil.
“Are you Elizabeth Smart?” the officer asked the young girl, the book says.
“No, I’m Augustine Marshall,” the girl replied, according to the book. Without asking for identification, the detective walked away, the authors say.
Tom Smart said the book shows why focusing on a particular theory or suspect, such as one-time “person of interest” Richard Ricci, can be damaging. Ricci had done work for the Smarts, and the investigation centered on him for some time. He ultimately died of natural causes.
Police focused on Ricci even as Mary Katherine Smart, Elizabeth’s younger sister and the only witness to the abduction, said the former Smart handyman was not the man she saw come into the girls’ shared room.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog About, Bookmark, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: High court agrees to review hallucinogenic tea case Next entry: Smarts distance themselves from book
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
