Skip to main content.
Religion News Blog is a non-profit service providing academics, religion professionals and other researchers with religion & cult news
ReligionNewsBlog

Religion news articles about religious cults, sects, world religions, and related issues

Navigation:
Home | Site Menu | About RNB | Cult FAQ | Cult Experts | Apologetics Index | Cult Information Search Engine
A Random Image
More articles about: Scientology:

Attorney-General confirms ruling for XS4ALL in Scientology Case

XS4ALL, Netherlands
Mar. 18, 2005
www.xs4all.nl
ReligionNewsBlog.com • Saturday March 19, 2005

Today, Attorney-General Verkade delivered his opinion regarding the Scientology case to the Dutch Supreme Court. In this case the Church of Scientology accuses Karin Spaink of copyright infringement for making parts of their course material available on her website. By publishing this material, Spaink wants to inspire a public debate about the nature of the cult.

See Also

Scientology Loses Again (Sep. 4, 2003)

Scientology cases verdict: victory for freedom of opinion (Sep. 4, 2003)

Scientology lodges appeal in cassation in case against Spaink and XS4ALL
(Dec. 5, 2003)

According to his 82 page opinion, Verkade is of the opinion that under certain circumstances freedom of speech, as protected by art. 10 EDHR, prevails over copyright. To quote Verkade: “Although copyright resides under Article 1 of the First Protocol of EDHR and can therefore be regarded as a human right, this does not exempt copyright from being balanced against the right to freedom of information.”

The opinion also contains essential remarks about the right to quote, especially with regard to the question of whether a work that is quoted from has been legally published.

Scientology’s Unethical Behavior
Scientology is a commercial venture masquerading as a religion. It increasignly acts like a hate group.
Scientology’s founder, L. Ron Hubbard, encouraged and condoned unethical behavior – including hate and harassment activities – in his ‘scriptures’
“The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win. The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly.”
- L. Ron Hubbard (see)
Research resources on Scientology

According to the Attorney-General it is not necessary for the author of the work to have given his consent to publication. In this particular case, making a work available to the public by a court library, as happened with the Fishman Affidavit, is sufficient for the work to have been legally published. Hence it may be quoted from by third parties.

If Supreme Court follows the advice of its Attorney-General, the ruling in appeal will stand. The Supreme Court will rule on July 8, 2005.

Bookmark share or email this Religion News Blog page Bookmark, Share, or Email This Page

Comment Comment

Join Religion News Blog at Google+ to comment, share, and follow.

Tags and keywords for this Apologetics Index entry Related News Articles

arrow Topic(s): Scientology
arrow

Religion News You Might Like These Articles As Well

RSS Feed Subscribe to Religion News Blog updates

Religion News Find Related Religion & Spirituality Books at Amazon.com

Religion News Search Search Religion News Blog