Previous entry: Public School in Polygamist Town at Center of Controversy
Next entry: Church Attack Motive Puzzles Investigators
Related
Advertisements *
Advertise Here *
Elsewhere
Subscribe: RSS
 |
RNB's RSS feed What is this? |
Subscribe: Email
 |
 Subscribe by Email What is this? |
Most Popular
- Attorney stymied by anti-polygamy activist’s TV demand
- Man killed at Hollywood Scientology center had made prior threats, police say
- Hate incidents in U.S. surge
- Five leaders of Muslim charity convicted in terrorism financing trial
- Swordsman Had Threatened Scientology Before
- Netherlands will extend burqa ban to universities
- California county OKs limits on picketing in response to anti-Scientology protests
- AUM Shinrikyo bankruptcy procedures to end, victims get 40% of compensation
- Mercy Ministries exorcism books leaked
- 8 new charges filed against jailed Tony Alamo
Lawsuit Against Kingston Clan Back in Court
More articles on this topic: PolygamyA lawsuit against the Kingston polygamy clan was back in court today.
And there are so many defendants, lawyers are even arguing about whether some of them actually exist.
John Hollenorst joins us with details.
This is the first time I can remember a lawyer having to assure a judge he does not represent anyone who doesn’t actually exist.
None of his 200 real clients were in court. But the judge seemed so exasperated, it was like he was herding cats.
Hundreds and hundreds of cats.
Mary Ann Kingston fled the Kingston clan. And legally she seems to have turned around and started firing back at every Kingston in sight.
John Morris/Plaintiff’s Lawyer: “IF THEY KNEW ABOUT THE PATTERN, IF THEY KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON, IF THEY PARTICIPATE IN THAT ORGANIZATION, WE THINK THEY SHOULD BE LIABLE.”
Her 110 million dollar lawsuit names as defendants more than 240 members of the clan and nearly 100 businesses they allegedly own.
She claims she was forced to marry her uncle when she was 16 and her father beat her when she tried to flee.
In court, lawyers argued over where defendants live, whether they’ve been properly served, whether some even exist.
Judge William Barrett ordered some defendants in, some out.
He told the lawyers: “I don’t know about you, but I can’t keep track of this stuff. There are too many defendants in this lawsuit,” the judge said, “and they all can’t be blamed.”
The point was echoed by a Kingston clan lawyer.
CARL KINGSTON, KINGSTON CLAN LAWYER: “MOST OF THE PEOPLE DON’T EVEN KNOW MARY ANNE, FOR THE FIRST THING. AND OBVIOUSLY I THINK YOU KNOW AS WELL AS I DO THAT 250 PEOPLE COULDN’T HAVE DONE WHAT SHE CLAIMED THEY DID.”
JOHN MORRIS, PLAINTIFF’S LAWYER: “THE GOAL IS TO ESTABLISH IN PART THAT IF YOU JOIN AN ORGANIZATION LIKE THAT AND YOU KNOW WHAT’S GOING ON, YOU DO IT AT YOUR PERIL.”
DANIEL IRVIN, KINGSTON CLAN LAWYER: “IF THERE WAS AN ILLEGAL ACTIVITY GOING ON. THEY HAVE YET TO PROVE THAT THERE WAS AN ILLEGAL ACTIVITY GOING ON.”
Don’t expect this case to wrap up quickly. It’s already been in process for two years. And they’re still trying to nail down the cast of characters.
What You Can Do From Here
|
Read More Articles On These Topics
Share, Blog, or Email This Article
Subscribe
Read Another Article
Previous entry: Public School in Polygamist Town at Center of Controversy Next entry: Church Attack Motive Puzzles Investigators
RNB Homepage with latest headlinesFind Related Information
Find Related Books
|
Share This Article
To share this page simply copy and paste one of these URL's:
